MHB Proving Integer Coefficients in Polynomial Rings w/ Gauss Lemma

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial Rings
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that if the product of two polynomials with rational coefficients results in a polynomial with integer coefficients, then the product of any coefficient from each polynomial must also be an integer. Participants reference Gauss's Lemma, noting that since the product polynomial is primitive, the coefficients of the original polynomials must relate through integers. The conversation reveals a misunderstanding about the nature of the coefficients, clarifying that while the coefficients of the polynomials are rational, their product can still yield integers. Ultimately, the application of Gauss's Lemma is deemed appropriate for concluding that the coefficients must indeed be integers. The discussion emphasizes the power of Gauss's Lemma in polynomial rings.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
Prove that if f(x) and g(x) are polynomials with rational co-efficients whose product f(x)g(x) has integer co-efficients, then the product of any co-efficient of g(x) with any coefficient of f(x) is an integer.

My initial thoughts on this are that the exercise seems to be set up for an application of Gauss Lemma since we have that Z is a UFD with field of fractions Q and further we have $$ p(x) \in Z[x] $$ where p(x) = f(x)g(x) and $$ f(x), g(x) \in Q[x] $$.

Thus we apply Gauss Lemma (see attached) so

p(x) = (rf(x))(sg(x))

where $$ rf(x), sg(x) \in Z[x] $$

But ... where to from here ... can someone please help me advance from here ...

Peter

[This problem has also been posted on MHF]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
Prove that if f(x) and g(x) are polynomials with rational co-efficients whose product f(x)g(x) has integer co-efficients, then the product of any co-efficient of g(x) with any coefficient of f(x) is an integer.

My initial thoughts on this are that the exercise seems to be set up for an application of Gauss Lemma since we have that Z is a UFD with field of fractions Q and further we have $$ p(x) \in Z[x] $$ where p(x) = f(x)g(x) and $$ f(x), g(x) \in Q[x] $$.

Thus we apply Gauss Lemma (see attached) so

p(x) = (rf(x))(sg(x))

where $$ rf(x), sg(x) \in Z[x] $$

But ... where to from here ... can someone please help me advance from here ...

The one thing I would think of is that given

$$ p(x) \in \mathbb{Z}[x] $$ where $$p(x)=f(x)g(x)$$ and $$ f(x), g(x) \in \mathbb{Q}[x]-\mathbb{Z}[x] $$, there exist some $$r,s \in \mathbb{Z}$$ so that $$ rf(x), sg(x) \in \mathbb{Z}[x] $$ are both primitive polynomials. Gauss's lemma tells us that $$r s \cdot p(x) = rf(x) \cdot sg(x)$$ must be a primitive polynomial itself. It follows that $$r,s=\pm 1$$, which means that we have deduced that f and g must have integer coefficients after all.

Clearly, if what I said holds, the statement would follow. Either there is some flaw in my logic, or Gauss's Lemma is too powerful a tool for this problem...
 
TheBigBadBen said:
The one thing I would think of is that given

$$ p(x) \in \mathbb{Z}[x] $$ where $$p(x)=f(x)g(x)$$ and $$ f(x), g(x) \in \mathbb{Q}[x]-\mathbb{Z}[x] $$, there exist some $$r,s \in \mathbb{Z}$$ so that $$ rf(x), sg(x) \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$$ are both primitive polynomials. Gauss's lemma tells us that $$r s \cdot p(x) = rf(x) \cdot sg(x)$$ must be a primitive polynomial itself. It follows that $$r,s=\pm 1$$, which means that we have deduced that f and g must have integer coefficients after all.

Clearly, if what I said holds, the statement would follow. Either there is some flaw in my logic, or Gauss's Lemma is too powerful a tool for this problem...

I made a mistake here: r and s are not necessarily integers. Since $r\,f(x)$ and $s\,g(x)$ are primitive, we can only guarantee that $r,s \in \mathbb{Q}$. This is still, however, sufficient; following the proof, we still find that $r\,s=\pm1$, which is enough to tell us that the product of a coefficient from one and a coefficient from the other is an integer.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
765
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
789
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K