Proving Lagrangian L is Not Uniquely Defined

[Grand]

Homework Statement

I am trying to prove that Lagrangian L is not uniquely defined, but only up to a time derivative of a function:
\frac{d\Lambda}{dt}, \Lambda(\vec{q}, t)

So

L > L+\frac{d\Lambda}{dt} = L+\frac{\partial \Lambda}{\partial q}~\dot{q}+\frac{\partial \Lambda}{\partial t}

But when I put it in the E-L eqns they definitely aren't as before.

Where have I gone wrong?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

[vela]

Show us what you got when you tried to crank out the Euler-Lagrange equations.

 

[Grand]

Alright:

\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial q}

\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial}{\partial \dot{q}}(L+\frac{\partial \Lambda}{\partial q}~\dot{q}+\frac{\partial \Lambda}{\partial t})=\frac{\partial}{\partial q}(L+\frac{\partial \Lambda}{\partial q}~\dot{q}+\frac{\partial \Lambda}{\partial t})

\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\partial L}{\partial q}+\frac{\partial \Lambda}{\partial q})=\frac{\partial L}{\partial q}+\frac{\partial^2 \Lambda}{\partial q^2}~\dot{q}+\frac{\partial^2 \Lambda}{\partial q \partial t}

 

[vela]

Now calculate what

\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial \Lambda}{\partial q}(q,t)\right)

is equal to.

(Do you only have one coordinate, or should you have q_i's?)

 

[Grand]

Well I can't, so I am asking for help.

 

[vela]

Don't be intimidated by the notation. The partial of Λ with respect to q is just another function of q and t. You find the total time derivative of it the same way you found the total time derivative of Λ(q,t).

 

[Grand]

I see. Thank you a lot.