Proving limit of a given sequence

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter issacnewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Sequence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the limit of the sequence \( \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left((2n)^{1/n}\right) = 1 \) for \( n \in \mathbb{N} \). The user initially establishes that \( (2n)^{1/n} > 0 \) and attempts to show \( (2n)^{1/n} > 1 \) by contradiction. They explore the implications of assuming \( (2n)^{1/n} \leq 1 \) and arrive at a contradiction, concluding that \( (2n)^{1/n} > 1 \). The user considers applying the Binomial theorem or Bernoulli's inequality to further their proof, while also noting the constraints of their study material, which limits the use of advanced theorems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with the Binomial theorem
  • Knowledge of Bernoulli's inequality
  • Basic properties of sequences and series
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of Bernoulli's inequality in limit proofs
  • Study the Binomial theorem and its implications for sequences
  • Explore the completeness property of real numbers in relation to limits
  • Review the definition of limits and their foundational concepts
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, particularly those studying limits and sequences, as well as educators seeking to guide learners through foundational proofs in mathematical analysis.

issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
HelloI want to prove the following.
\[ \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left((2n)^{1/n}\right) = 1 \]
where \( n \in \mathbb{N} \). Now since we have nth root of a positive number,
I used theorem on the existence of nth root to argue that \( (2n)^{1/n} > 0 \).
Next I tried to prove that \( (2n)^{1/n} > 1 \) as following. Assume that
\( (2n)^{1/n} \leqslant 1 \). If \( (2n)^{1/n} = 1 \) then \( 2n = 1\Rightarrow \; n = \frac{1}{2} \) , which is a contradiction since \( n\in \mathbb{N} \). So if \( (2n)^{1/n} < 1 \) then \( 0< (2n)^{1/n} < 1 \).
Then we have
\[ (2n)^{1/n} = \frac{1}{1+a} \]
for some \( a > 0 \). It follows that
\[ 2n = \frac{1}{(1+a)^n} \]
\[ \Rightarrow \; 2n = \frac{1}{1+na+\ldots} \]
Since \( a>0 \), we have \( (1+na + \ldots ) > 1 \). So
\[ \frac{1}{1+na+\ldots} < 1 \]
\[ \Rightarrow \; 2n < 1 \]
which means \( n < \frac{1}{2} \). Since \( n\in \mathbb{N} \), this
leads to contradiction. So I proved that \( (2n)^{1/n} > 1 \). If this is so,
then it can be written as
\[ (2n)^{1/n} = 1 + k \]
for some \( k > 0 \).
\[ \Rightarrow \; 2n = (1+k)^n \]
Till this far I have come. I am thinking of either using Binomial theorem or
Bernoulli's inequality. Any guidance will be helpful. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IssacNewton said:
HelloI want to prove the following.
\[ \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left((2n)^{1/n}\right) = 1 \]
where \( n \in \mathbb{N} \). Now since we have nth root of a positive number,
I used theorem on the existence of nth root to argue that \( (2n)^{1/n} > 0 \).
Next I tried to prove that \( (2n)^{1/n} > 1 \) as following. Assume that
\( (2n)^{1/n} \leqslant 1 \). If \( (2n)^{1/n} = 1 \) then \( 2n = 1\Rightarrow \; n = \frac{1}{2} \) , which is a contradiction since \( n\in \mathbb{N} \). So if \( (2n)^{1/n} < 1 \) then \( 0< (2n)^{1/n} < 1 \).
Then we have
\[ (2n)^{1/n} = \frac{1}{1+a} \]
for some \( a > 0 \). It follows that
\[ 2n = \frac{1}{(1+a)^n} \]
\[ \Rightarrow \; 2n = \frac{1}{1+na+\ldots} \]
Since \( a>0 \), we have \( (1+na + \ldots ) > 1 \). So
\[ \frac{1}{1+na+\ldots} < 1 \]
\[ \Rightarrow \; 2n < 1 \]
which means \( n < \frac{1}{2} \). Since \( n\in \mathbb{N} \), this
leads to contradiction. So I proved that \( (2n)^{1/n} > 1 \). If this is so,
then it can be written as
\[ (2n)^{1/n} = 1 + k \]
for some \( k > 0 \).
\[ \Rightarrow \; 2n = (1+k)^n \]
Till this far I have come. I am thinking of either using Binomial theorem or
Bernoulli's inequality. Any guidance will be helpful. Thanks

May be that Your task is simplified if You try to find...

$\displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \ln\ \{ (2\ n)^{\frac{1}{n}} \}\ (1)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Hello

The book I am doing these problems from (Bartle 4ed.), has not introduced any complicated theorems about limits so far (This is section 3.1 in the chapter on limits, which is 3rd chapter). So I am supposed to use some basic machinery developed so far, which is definition of limit, Bernoulli's inequality, Binomial theorem, Archimedes's theorem, Completeness property etc. Using logarithms would be outside of this scope as the author has not used it till this point. I am sure there is some way of handling this within the basic machinery.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K