Proving 𝛑² = n(n+1) 2ⁿ⁻² w/ Clever Trick

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the identity involving the summation of squares multiplied by binomial coefficients, specifically the equation \(\sum_{i=1}^{n}i^2 {n \choose i} = n(n+1) 2^{n-2}\). Participants are exploring various approaches to establish this identity, with a focus on clever mathematical tricks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • One participant suggests using the second derivative of the binomial expansion of \((1+x)^n\) and manipulating the summation index. Another participant questions the validity of a proposed adjustment to the identity, pointing out inconsistencies when substituting values. A third participant acknowledges a mistake in their algebra and proposes a related identity that could be approached similarly.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering different methods and questioning assumptions. There is recognition of potential errors in reasoning, and alternative identities are being considered for further exploration.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the identity and its proof, with some noting the challenges posed by cases of odd and even \(n\). There is an emphasis on finding a more efficient proof than the lengthy case-by-case analysis initially attempted.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Does anyone know a clever way to prove that

\sum_{i=1}^{n}i^2 {n \choose i} = n(n+1) 2^{n-2}

where B(n,i) is n take i?

I can do it, but I had to divide into the cases of n = odd and n = even and it took about 1 page front and back. I'm sure there is a trick.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Take the second derivative of (1+x)^n and its binomial expansion, then mess with the index of the summation and set x=1. (I'm assuming your n+1 is actually n-1.)
 
morphism said:
Take the second derivative of (1+x)^n and its binomial expansion, then mess with the index of the summation and set x=1. (I'm assuming your n+1 is actually n-1.)
? It's obviously not true if you replace (n+1) by (n-1). Take n= 1. Then the lefthand side is 1. [iotex]n(n+1)2^{n-2}[/itex] becomes, for n= 1, 1(2)2^{-1}= 1. If you replace (n+1) by (n-1), it becomes 2(0)2^{-1}= 0[/itex].
 
You're right of course. I was a bit careless with my algebra. The identity I had in mind was:
\sum_{i=0}^n i(i-1) {n \choose i} = n(n-1)2^{n-2}

But no worries - a similar trick can still be applied: Differentiate, multiply by x, and differentiate again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K