MHB Proving Nine-Point Circle Theorem w/ Parallelogram & Symmetry

  • Thread starter Thread starter pholee95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the Nine-Point Circle Theorem using a triangle and specific points related to it. Participants emphasize the need to establish that quadrilateral EDBF is a parallelogram and to demonstrate that DB equals DN. A symmetry argument is suggested to show that points N, L, and M lie on the circumscribed circle γ. There is a request for clarification on the problem's details, as the initial conditions may not be sufficient. Engaging with the problem through preliminary work or thoughts is encouraged to facilitate assistance.
pholee95
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm stuck on this problem and would like some help.

The purpose of this exercise is to prove the Nine-Point Circle Theorem. Let triangleABC be
a Euclidean triangle and let points D, E, F, L, M, N, and H be as in Figure 8.46. Let γ
be the circumscribed circle for triangleDEF.

a) Prove that quadrilateralEDBF is a parallelogram. Prove that DB=DN. Use a symmetry
argument to show that N lies on γ. Prove, in a similar way, that L and M lie on γ.

I have attached on how the picture looks like.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot.3.jpg
    Screenshot.3.jpg
    27.1 KB · Views: 124
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In general EDBF is not a parallelogram. You need to be given some extra information about the circle. One may expect that this information would be that points L, M and N are on the circle but you're expected to prove that they are in a subsequent part of the exercise. This leads me to ask if you've typed the problem accurately.

If you have a point of clarification, that's good, but please post some work and/or thoughts on how to approach the problem as well.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top