MHB Proving Nine-Point Circle Theorem w/ Parallelogram & Symmetry

  • Thread starter Thread starter pholee95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle
pholee95
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm stuck on this problem and would like some help.

The purpose of this exercise is to prove the Nine-Point Circle Theorem. Let triangleABC be
a Euclidean triangle and let points D, E, F, L, M, N, and H be as in Figure 8.46. Let γ
be the circumscribed circle for triangleDEF.

a) Prove that quadrilateralEDBF is a parallelogram. Prove that DB=DN. Use a symmetry
argument to show that N lies on γ. Prove, in a similar way, that L and M lie on γ.

I have attached on how the picture looks like.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot.3.jpg
    Screenshot.3.jpg
    27.1 KB · Views: 120
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In general EDBF is not a parallelogram. You need to be given some extra information about the circle. One may expect that this information would be that points L, M and N are on the circle but you're expected to prove that they are in a subsequent part of the exercise. This leads me to ask if you've typed the problem accurately.

If you have a point of clarification, that's good, but please post some work and/or thoughts on how to approach the problem as well.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top