Proving Open Sets: Definition and Example in R3 | Homework Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Iconate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition and proof of open sets in R³, specifically addressing the set defined by the conditions {(x⁴)(y⁴)(z) | x > 0; y > 0; z < 0}. Participants are exploring the implications of the definition of open sets and how to demonstrate that this particular set is open.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of an open set and how to apply it to the given set. There are attempts to manipulate inequalities and clarify the relationship between the original set and its transformed version. Questions arise about the equivalence of sets and the nature of points within these sets.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications on definitions and mathematical reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the equivalence of the sets and the requirements for a set to be considered open, but no consensus has been reached on the proof itself.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of clearly defining symbols and variables in proofs. There is also a recognition of the challenges posed by the original poster's syntax and notation, which may affect understanding. The discussion includes considerations of whether certain points can be classified as open sets.

Iconate
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Define the notion of an open set in Rn.
Prove that the set {(x4)(y4)(z) | x > 0; y > 0; z < 0 } is open in R3.

Homework Equations



Definition of an open set

Br(p) = { x is an element in Rn |x - p| < r} c U

The Attempt at a Solution



Well we first pick a point p in U, and we want to find and r > 0 s.t. Br(p) is in U.
Choose r = min(|x4||y4||z|)

Then q= (x`, y`, z`) element of Br(p)

(x` - x4)2 + (y` - y4)2 + (z` - z)2 < r2

And from here I have to show x` > 0, y` > 0, z` < 0
x and y will follow the same way procedurally; from the inequality above, we know

(x` - x4)2 < r2
|x` - x4| < r

Here is where I get stuck; with exponents I am finding this more difficult to rearrange, am I supposed to use this inequality;?

x2 + y2 >= 2xy, by comparing both x and y to r?

Any help or insight would be great thanks, proving open sets have been giving me a lot of difficulty.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, a tip on writing proofs: Make sure, in general, to define all your symbols and variables. Although the reader might be able to figure out what your notation means based on previous knowledge, most would rather spend the majority of their time understanding your proof.

For example, your definition for an open set uses no standard symbols, and it took me a minute or so to figure out that you were trying (i think) to define an open set in [tex]\mathbb{R}^n[/tex] as follows: A subset [tex]U[/tex] of [tex]\mathbb{R}^n[/tex] is called open if for every point p in U there's an r>0 such that the set [tex]B_r(p)=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^n : |x-p|<r\}\subseteq U.[/tex]

Also, I'm assuming [tex](a)(b)(c)[/tex] is the ordered triplet [tex](a,b,c)[/tex]

As to the proof, the easiest way to go about this is to realize that the set [tex]\{(x^4,y^4,z):x>0,y>0,z<0\}[/tex] is the same as the set [tex]\{(x,y,z):x>0,y>0,z<0\}[/tex]. Once you do that, just continue the proof in the same way as before and you should be fine.
 
Hey thanks, sorry for my syntax, first time on this forum, getting used to latex.

I am not too sure how they are equivalent; but, does this follow correctly;

I had
(x` - x4)2 < r2

and instead of saying;
|x` - x4| < r

Can I say; r2 [tex]\leq[/tex] x4
thus;

|x` - x4| < x4

Adding x4 to each;

0 < x` < 2x4

And y` will follow the same way, however is that correct in saying that x` and y` are open?
(still have to show z` is open)
 
Iconate said:
Hey thanks, sorry for my syntax, first time on this forum, getting used to latex.

I am not too sure how they are equivalent; but, does this follow correctly;
Suppose [tex](x^4,y^4,z)\in \{(x^4,y^4,z):x>0,y>0,z<0\}[/tex]. Then x^4>0, y^4>0, and z<0, so [tex](x^4,y^4,z)\in\{(x,y,z):x>0,y>0,z<0\}[/tex].

Conversely, if [tex](x,y,z)\in\{(x,y,z):x>0,y>0,z<0\}[/tex], then [tex](x,y,z)=\left((\sqrt[4]{x})^4,(\sqrt[4]{x})^4,z\right)\in\{(x^4,y^4,z):x>0,y>0,z<0\}[/tex]. Thus, the two sets are equivalent.

Iconate said:
Can I say; r2 [tex]\leq[/tex] x4
thus;

|x` - x4| < x4

Adding x4 to each;

0 < x` < 2x4

And y` will follow the same way, however is that correct in saying that x` and y` are open?
(still have to show z` is open)


If you meant [tex]r\leq x^4[/tex], then your reasoning is correct (assuming by [tex]r=\min(|x^4||y^4||z^4|)[/tex] you meant [tex]r=\min\{|x^4|,|y^4|,|z^4|\}[/tex]). However, x' is not open, nor is (x',y',z)--it is a point contained in the set [tex]B_r(p)[/tex] which is contained in some open set U.

Also, a semicolon is not the same as a colon.
 
foxjwill said:
If you meant [tex]r\leq x^4[/tex], then your reasoning is correct (assuming by [tex]r=\min(|x^4||y^4||z^4|)[/tex] you meant [tex]r=\min\{|x^4|,|y^4|,|z^4|\}[/tex]). However, x' is not open, nor is (x',y',z)--it is a point contained in the set [tex]B_r(p)[/tex] which is contained in some open set U.

Also, a semicolon is not the same as a colon.

Yes, sorry I did mean [tex]r\leq x^4[/tex]
Why isn't x` open when I showed that x` > 0 (forgetting the other two points y`, and z` at the moment)
 
Iconate said:
Why isn't x` open when I showed that x` > 0 (forgetting the other two points y`, and z` at the moment)

Recall that a subset U of [tex]\mathbb{R}^n[/tex] is defined to be open if for every point in U there's an r>0 such that [tex]B_r(p)=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^n : |x-p|<r\}\subseteq U[/tex].

In other words, the requirements for some object U to be open in [tex]\mathbb{R}^3[/tex] are that
  1. U is a set,
  2. U is a subset of [tex]\mathbb{R}^3[/tex], and
  3. for every point in U there's an r>0 such that [tex]B_r(p)=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^3 : |x-p|<r\}\subseteq U.[/tex]
The object x' doesn't satisfy any of these.

Now recall that the elements of [tex]\mathbb{R}^3[/tex] are called points. Since x' is not an element of [tex]\mathbb{R}^3[/tex], it is not a point (and neither are y' or z'). However, the ordered triple (x',y',z') is an element of [tex]\mathbb{R}^3[/tex] and is therefore a point. But is it an open set? No, it is not, because it again doesn't satisfy any of the requirements above.

Finally, consider the set [tex]\{(x^4,y^4,z):x>0,y>0,z<0\}[/tex]. Clearly, it satisfies the first two requirements. Thus, what you've been trying to show in your proof is that it satisfies the third and is therefore open. But to reiterate, the elements (i.e. the points) in that set are not open.
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K