MHB Proving or disproving this matrix V is invertible.

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaienfr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
kaienfr
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,
I find an interesting matrix which seems to be always invertible. But I have no idea how to prove it! So I write down here for some ideas. Here is the problem:

Let us take $n\in \mathbb{N}^*$ bins and $d\in \mathbb{N}^*$ balls. Denote the set $B = \{\alpha^1, \ldots, \alpha^m\}$ to be all possible choices for putting $d$ balls into $n$ bins (empty bin is possible), such as
$$\alpha^1 = (d,0,\ldots, 0), ~ \alpha^2 = (0,d,\ldots, 0), \ldots$$
Let us define the matrix $V$ as:
$$V = \begin{bmatrix}
(\alpha^1)^{\alpha^1} & \cdots & (\alpha^1)^{\alpha^m}\\
(\alpha^2)^{\alpha^1} & \cdots & (\alpha^2)^{\alpha^m}\\
\vdots & \vdots & \vdots\\
(\alpha^m)^{\alpha^1} & \cdots & (\alpha^m)^{\alpha^m}
\end{bmatrix}$$
where the notation $(\alpha^i)^{\alpha^j} = \displaystyle\prod_{k=1}^{n}(\alpha^i_k)^{\alpha^j_k}$, under the assumption that $0^0=1$.

Question: "is the matrix $V$ invertible?"

I have tested several examples, and it seems that $V$ is always invertible, but I have no idea how to prove it or find a counterexample.
Here are two facts I understood:
  1. all diagonal elements are strictly positives, so the trace of $V$ is strictly positive.
  2. the matrix $V$ is not symmetric.
Does anyone can help to prove or disprove the invertibility of $V$? Thanks a lot in advance for sharing any idea.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a better understanding of the problem, here is an example:

Let $n=3$ and $d=2$, then we have all possible choices for putting $2$ balls into $3$ bins as:
$$B = \{(2,0,0),(0,2,0),(0,0,2),(1,1,0),(1,0,1),(0,1,1)\}.$$
The elements in the first row of the matrix $V$ are computed as:
$$(\alpha^1)^{\alpha^1} = (2,0,0)^{(2,0,0)} = 2^2\times 0^0\times 0^0 = 4,$$
$$(\alpha^1)^{\alpha^2} = (2,0,0)^{(0,2,0)} = 2^0\times 0^2\times 0^0 = 0,$$
and so on.
Thus, we have the matrix $V$:
$$V = \begin{bmatrix}
4&0&0&0&0&0\\
0&4&0&0&0&0\\
0&0&4&0&0&0\\
1&1&0&1&0&0\\
1&0&1&0&1&0\\
0&1&1&0&0&1\\
\end{bmatrix}
$$
which is clearly invertible.

Remarks: Note that, the matrix $V$ is not always triangular. as an example, for n=3, d=3, then the element $$(2,1,0)^{(1,2,0)} = 2^1\times 1^2 \times 0^0 = 2,$$ and $$(1,2,0)^{(2,1,0)} = 1^2\times 2^1 \times 0^0 = 2$$
which are both non-zeros, thus $V$ will be never invertible in this case.

Moreover, when the elements $(\alpha^i)^{\alpha^j}$ and $(\alpha^j)^{\alpha^i}$ (with $i\neq j$) are non-zeros, they may not be equal.
E.g., n=4, d=8, we have
$$(1,1,2,4)^{(2,2,2,2)} = 64$$
but
$$(2,2,2,2)^{(1,1,2,4)} = 256.$$

So, as a conclusion: "the matrix $V$ is neither triangular nor symmetric in general."
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K