Proving Properties of P(K) when x $\notin$ S

  • Thread starter Thread starter glebovg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Properties
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving properties of the power set P(K) when x is not an element of a finite set S. It establishes that P(K) is the disjoint union of P(S) and the set X, where X consists of subsets of K that include x. The discussion confirms that every element of X can be represented as a union of a subset of S and {x}, leading to the conclusion that P(K) contains twice as many elements as P(S) when S is finite.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of power sets and their properties
  • Familiarity with set theory concepts, including unions and intersections
  • Knowledge of bijections and combinatorial identities
  • Basic grasp of finite sets and subset notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of power sets in set theory
  • Learn about bijections and their applications in combinatorics
  • Explore combinatorial identities, particularly the binomial theorem
  • Investigate the implications of disjoint unions in set theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of discrete mathematics, and anyone interested in set theory and combinatorial proofs will benefit from this discussion.

glebovg
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
Let S be any finite set and suppose x \notin S. Let K = S \cup \left\{ x \right\}.

1. Prove that P(K) is the disjoint union of P(S) and X = \left \{T \subseteq K : x \in T \right\}. That is, show that P(K) = P(S) \cup X and P(S) \cap X = \emptyset

2. Prove that every element of X is the union of a subset of S with {x}, and that if you take different subsets of S you get different elements of X. Argue that, therefore, X has the same number of elements as P(S).

3. Argue that the previous two parts allow you to conclude that if S is a finite set, then P(K) has twice as many elements as P(S).

I can do 1. Can anyone help with 2 and 3?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For 3), think of a bijection ; the subsets of K either contain x , or do not contain it. Try some small examples.
 
For 2) any element T of X is subset of K with x inside it. x isn't in S so T must be at least {x}, but it can also include elements of S since K is the union of S and {x}. If you take two elements SU{x} and S'U{x} in X, thinking about the set SU{x}-S'U{x} should help you prove the last part.
 
aeroplane, so I get S \cap \left\{ x \right\} - S^{c} \cup \left\{ x \right\} \Leftrightarrow \left\{ x \right\}^{c}. How does it allow me to conclude that if we take different subsets of S we get different elements of X and that X has the same number of elements as P(S)?
 
For two sets SU{x} and S'U{x} in X, SU{x}-S'U{x} is the empty set iff S=S'. Every set of X has to be at least {x}, so the difference between two elements has to be related to a difference in the subsets of S. Then you can think of X as P(S) where each element has {x} attached to it, so it must have the same number of elements.
 
By S' do you mean the complement of S, or some other arbitrary set?
 
Sorry, some other arbitrary set, S={s_1,s_2,...,s_n}, S'={s'_1,...,s'_n} since both are finite.
 
Basically, for every set without a specific x, you can find a new set with that x, by adjoining x to any of the existing sets, and there are no other possible subsets of S\/{x}, since subsets of S\/{x} must contain either elements of S, or elements of {x}:

Maybe you can also use combinatorial identities:

Number of subsets of a set with n elements:

0-element subsets: nC0 ( " n choose 0" )

1-element subsets nC1

...

n-element subsets nCn

_____________________________

nC0+nC1+...+nCn = (1+1)n

Now try for (n+1) elements.
 
Thank you.
 
  • #10
No problem; glad I could help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K