Proving root 3 is irrational using an algebraic identity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter flying2000
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 5K views
flying2000
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
1)write root(3)-1 in another way,and use this to produce a non-trivial equation for root(3) in terms of itself

2)suppose m,n(m,n is natural numbers) are such that m/n=root(3),use (1) to write root(3)as another combination of m and n.
3)use (2) to show that root(3) in not rational.

Any hints appreciated..
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How about

[tex]\sqrt 3 - 1 = \frac {2}{1+\sqrt 3}[/tex]?
 
Which, I think, would then give [itex]x- 1= \frac{2}{x+1}[/itex] as a non-trivial equation for [itex]\sqrt{3}[/itex].

If [itex]\frac{m}{n}= \sqrt{3}[/itex], then [itex]\frac{m}{n}-1= \frac{2}{\frac{m}{n}+1}[/itex]. Does that lead to anything?
 
Hmm. How do you define non-trivial?
 
thanx a lot!

thanks a lot to all you guys!
really appreciated..



HallsofIvy said:
Which, I think, would then give [itex]x- 1= \frac{2}{x+1}[/itex] as a non-trivial equation for [itex]\sqrt{3}[/itex].

If [itex]\frac{m}{n}= \sqrt{3}[/itex], then [itex]\frac{m}{n}-1= \frac{2}{\frac{m}{n}+1}[/itex]. Does that lead to anything?
 
I would consider anything other than [itex]x= \sqrt{3}[/itex] to be "non-trivial"!
 
Another question

HallsofIvy said:
I would consider anything other than [itex]x= \sqrt{3}[/itex] to be "non-trivial"!

root(3)=(m+3n)/(m+n), if m,n is allowed having the common factor,Does it lead to any contradiction?
 
i was wondering wut the answer would be for question 3) for general knowledge