Proving S^n = 0 using Shift Operator Properties

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
TranscendArcu
Messages
277
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg810/scaled.php?server=810&filename=screenshot20120131at923.png&res=medium

The Attempt at a Solution


So in particular I want to look at the last part of this problem. That is, "Show that [itex]S^n = 0[/itex]"

I know that [itex]dim(KerS^k) = k[/itex] and therefore, [itex]dim(ImS^k)= n-k[/itex]. If k=n, [itex]dim(ImS^k)= n- n = 0[/itex] which implies that [itex]ImS^k = \left\{ 0 \right\}[/itex].

I'm having trouble drawing from this the conclusion that [itex]S^n = 0[/itex]. Is S an isomorphism? If so, does that mean that the only thing that can map to 0 in the codomain is 0 in the domain?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You mean [itex]ImS^n = \left\{ 0 \right\}[/itex]. That means for all vectors x, [itex]S^n(x)=0[/itex]. Doesn't that mean [itex]S^n=0[/itex]? Of course S isn't an isomorphism! It has a nonzero kernel. Not sure what's bothering you here.
 
Last edited: