Proving Simplicity of Lie Algebra L: Basis Elements and Ideal Structure

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ElDavidas
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the simplicity of the Lie algebra L, defined as a subspace of sl(2, R) with specific basis elements e_1, e_2, and e_3. The key conclusion is that L is simple, as the only ideals are {0} and L itself. This is demonstrated by calculating the commutators of the basis elements, which span the entire algebra. An alternative method involves establishing an isomorphism to sl_2(R).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lie algebras and their properties
  • Familiarity with the structure of sl(2, R)
  • Knowledge of commutators and their significance in algebra
  • Basic linear algebra concepts, particularly matrix operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of simple Lie algebras in depth
  • Learn about the structure and representation of sl(2, R)
  • Explore the concept of ideals in Lie algebras
  • Investigate isomorphisms between different Lie algebras
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, particularly those specializing in algebra, theoretical physicists working with symmetries, and advanced students studying Lie algebras and their applications.

ElDavidas
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Take L to be a subspace of sl (2,R). (R is the real numbers)

[tex] L = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 0 & -c & b\\<br /> c & 0 & -a\\<br /> -b & a & 0<br /> \end{array}\right)[/tex]

The basis elements of L are

[tex] e_1 = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 0 & 0 & 0\\<br /> 0 & 0 & -1\\<br /> 0 & 1 & 0<br /> \end{array}\right)[/tex]

[tex] e_2 = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 0 & 0 & 1\\<br /> 0 & 0 & 0\\<br /> -1 & 0 & 0<br /> \end{array}\right)[/tex]

[tex] e_3 = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 0 & -1 & 0\\<br /> 1 & 0 & 0\\<br /> 0 & 0 & 0<br /> \end{array}\right)[/tex]

What is the best way to show that this Lie Algebra is simple (i.e. the only ideals are {0} and L? I know it's non-abelian.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By working out the [ ] of e_i and e_j, you should see how to show that the commutator spans the whole of the L again. That should do it.

Or you can just write down an isomorphism to sl_2(R). (Surely you meant to say L is a subspace of sl_3).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K