MHB Proving $\sin\left(10^{\circ}\right)$ is Rational or Irrational

Fallen Angel
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
Is $\sin\left(10^{\circ}\right)$ rational or not? Prove it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Fallen Angel said:
Is $\sin\left(10^{\circ}\right)$ rational or not? Prove it.

[sp]From the relation...

$\displaystyle \sin \alpha = 3\ \sin \frac{\alpha}{3} - 4\ \sin^{3} \frac{\alpha}{3}\ (1)$

... it follows that $\displaystyle x= \sin \frac{\pi}{18}$ must be root of the cubic equation...

$\displaystyle 8\ x^{3} - 6\ x + 1 =0\ (2)$

If x is rational, then You can write $\displaystyle x = \frac{a}{b}$, being a and b integers... but in this case for (2) it must be...

$\displaystyle b = 4\ \sqrt{3\ a - \frac{1}{2}}\ (3)$

... and that's impossible for a and b integers... the conclusion is that x isn't rational...[/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Good work chisigma, my solution was almost the same.

From $8x^3-6x+1=0$, let $y=2 sin \ 10º$, then $y^3-3y+1=0$ and this polynomial has no rational roots (because of Gauss Lemma).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top