MHB Proving $\sin\left(10^{\circ}\right)$ is Rational or Irrational

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving whether $\sin(10^{\circ})$ is rational or irrational. It utilizes the relation $\sin \alpha = 3\ \sin \frac{\alpha}{3} - 4\ \sin^{3} \frac{\alpha}{3}$, leading to the cubic equation $8\ x^{3} - 6\ x + 1 =0$. The argument posits that if $x$ were rational, it could be expressed as a fraction of integers, but this leads to a contradiction involving the square root of a non-integer. Consequently, the conclusion drawn is that $\sin(10^{\circ})$ is irrational. The discussion is supported by mathematical reasoning and a shared solution approach.
Fallen Angel
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
Is $\sin\left(10^{\circ}\right)$ rational or not? Prove it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Fallen Angel said:
Is $\sin\left(10^{\circ}\right)$ rational or not? Prove it.

[sp]From the relation...

$\displaystyle \sin \alpha = 3\ \sin \frac{\alpha}{3} - 4\ \sin^{3} \frac{\alpha}{3}\ (1)$

... it follows that $\displaystyle x= \sin \frac{\pi}{18}$ must be root of the cubic equation...

$\displaystyle 8\ x^{3} - 6\ x + 1 =0\ (2)$

If x is rational, then You can write $\displaystyle x = \frac{a}{b}$, being a and b integers... but in this case for (2) it must be...

$\displaystyle b = 4\ \sqrt{3\ a - \frac{1}{2}}\ (3)$

... and that's impossible for a and b integers... the conclusion is that x isn't rational...[/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Good work chisigma, my solution was almost the same.

From $8x^3-6x+1=0$, let $y=2 sin \ 10º$, then $y^3-3y+1=0$ and this polynomial has no rational roots (because of Gauss Lemma).
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top