MHB Proving $(T^2-I)(T-3I) = 0$ for Linear Operator $T$

Guest2
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Problem: Let $T$ be the linear operator on $\mathbb{R}^3$ defined by

$$T(x_1, x_2, x_3)= (3x_1, x_1-x_2, 2x_1+x_2+x_3)$$

Is $T$ invertible? If so, find a rule for $T^{-1}$ like the one which defines $T$.

Prove that $(T^2-I)(T-3I) = 0.$


Attempt:

$(T|I)=\left[\begin{array}{ccc|ccc}
3 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & -1 &0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
2 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
\end{array}\right] \to \left[\begin{array}{ccc|ccc}
1 & 0 & 0 & 1/3 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 1 &0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 1 & -2/3 & 1 & 0 \\
\end{array}\right] = (I|T^{-1})$

Thus $T$ is invertible as it row-reduces to $I$ and

$$T^{-1} = \left[\begin{array}{ccc}
& 1/3 & 0 & 0 \\
& 0 & -1 & 0 \\
& -2/3 & 1 & 0 \\
\end{array}\right]$$

Thus the rule is $T^{-1}(x_1, x_2, x_3) = (\frac{1}{3}x_1, -x_2, -\frac{2}{3}x_1+x_2).$

But I'm stuck on showing that $(T^2-I)(T-3I) = 0$. I could directly manipulate this, but I think I'm supposed to somehow use linearity/earlier part of the question. Is this the case? Could someone please clarify.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Guest said:
Problem: Let $T$ be the linear operator on $\mathbb{R}^3$ defined by

$$T(x_1, x_2, x_3)= (3x_1, x_1-x_2, 2x_1+x_2+x_3)$$

Is $T$ invertible? If so, find a rule for $T^{-1}$ like the one which defines $T$.

Prove that $(T^2-I)(T-3I) = 0.$


Attempt:

$(T|I)=\left[\begin{array}{ccc|ccc}
3 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & -1 &0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
2 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
\end{array}\right] \to \left[\begin{array}{ccc|ccc}
1 & 0 & 0 & 1/3 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 1 &0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 1 & -2/3 & 1 & 0 \\
\end{array}\right] = (I|T^{-1})$

Thus $T$ is invertible as it row-reduces to $I$ and

$$T^{-1} = \left[\begin{array}{ccc}
& 1/3 & 0 & 0 \\
& 0 & -1 & 0 \\
& -2/3 & 1 & 0 \\
\end{array}\right]$$

Thus the rule is $T^{-1}(x_1, x_2, x_3) = (\frac{1}{3}x_1, -x_2, -\frac{2}{3}x_1+x_2).$

But I'm stuck on showing that $(T^2-I)(T-3I) = 0$. I could directly manipulate this, but I think I'm supposed to somehow use linearity/earlier part of the question. Is this the case? Could someone please clarify.

Hi Guest,

The matrix you've found for $T^{-1}$ is not actually the inverse.
In particular this shows because it's degenerate.
That is, it has a column with only zeroes.
More generally, its determinant is zero, meaning it's non-invertible.

The problem is that when you created $T$, the second row of the leftmost column should contain a $1$ instead of a $0$.

To show that $(T^2-I)(T-3I) = 0$, we might use the Caylay-Hamilton theorem, that says that the characteristic equation of a matrix also holds for the matrix itself.
Do you know what the characteristic equation is? (Wondering)
 
Hi, I like Serena,

Thanks for the reply.

The characteristic equation is $P(\lambda) = \det(\lambda I - T) = (3-\lambda)(\lambda^2-1)$

So then $P(T) = 0 \implies (3I-T)(T^2-I) = 0 \implies (T^2-I)(T-3I) = 0.$
 
To show $T$ is invertible, it suffices to show $T(v) = 0 \implies v = 0$.

This is not hard to demonstrate:

If $T(x_1,x_2,x_3) = (0,0,0)$, then $3x_1 = 0$, so $x_1 = 0$.

Now $T(0,x_2,x_3) = (0,-x_2,x_2+x_3)$, and if this is $(0,0,0)$ we must have $x_2 = 0$.

Finally, since $T(0,0,x_3) = (0,0,x_3)$ if the RHS is 0, we must have $x_3 = 0$.

Of course, this tells us $T^{-1}$ exists, but does not tell us what it IS.

But if $T(x_1,x_2,x_3) = (1,0,0)$, it follows that $(x_1,x_2,x_3) = T^{-1}(1,0,0)$, which would give us the first column of $T^{-1}$'s matrix (in the standard basis).

Equating $(3x_1,x_1-x_2,2x_1+x_2+x_3) = (1,0,0)$ gives us $x_1 = \frac{1}{3}$, which then tells us $x_2 = \frac{1}{3}$, and thus $x_3 = -1$.

Solving $T(x_1,x_2,x_3) = (0,1,0)$ and $T(x_1,x_2,x_3) = (0,0,1)$ similarly gives us the second and third columns of $T^{-1}$. You should then be able to give a similar form for $T^{-1}$ as was given for $T$.

I do not know if the Cayley-Hamilton theorem is available for you to use-that is the "lazy" way to go. Otherwise, you would have to compute the given product the "long way".

Knowing $T^3 - 3T^2 - T + 3I = 0$, does give us another way to compute $T^{-1}$:

$T^3 - 3T^2 - T = -3I$
$T(-\frac{1}{3}(T^2 - 3T - I)) = I$

so, evidently:

$T^{-1} = -\frac{1}{3}(T^2 - 2T - I)$
 
Deveno said:
...
This is such a nice method, thank you!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top