Proving That a Lorentzian Structure Cannot be Put on S^2

  • #1
1
0
It is fairly easy to prove that each manifold can be given a Riemannian structure. The argument is standard: locally you give the riemannian structure and then you use partions of unity. This proof breaks down for signed metrics. Even for a manifold requiring only two charts. For example, I've been told that you cannot put on S^2 a metric with signature +1, -1. This is quite remarkable, since on S^2-{p} diffeo to R^2 you can! Any ideas on proving it?
 
  • #2
The existence of a Lorentz metric implies the existence of a non-vanishing vector field (in physical terms, time's arrow is always defined). The two-sphere doesn't have one.
 

Suggested for: Proving That a Lorentzian Structure Cannot be Put on S^2

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
976
Replies
1
Views
324
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
521
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top