Proving that Both m and n are Odd using Indirect Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter blimkie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 6K views
blimkie
Messages
111
Reaction score
0
use the method of indirect proof. if m and n are integars and there product mn is odd, prove that both m and n are odd

so i wnat to prove that (m)(n) odd (mn)

so i assume that (mn) is even to go about the indirect method

now i need a jump start i wrote some equations and some algebra but dindt come up with a contradication

help is appreciative that's a lot guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cyclovenom said:
Start off by
[tex]m = 2k+1[/tex]
[tex]n = 2c + 1[/tex]
where k and c is any natural number.

No, that's exactly the wrong thing to do.

Since blimkie wants to use indirect proof to prove that "both m and n must be odd, he should negate that: "either m or n is even".

So assume m= 2p, which is even for any integer p, multiply by n and see what happens!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A number to be even it should be divisible by 2. thus for the product mn to be divisible by 2 any of the integers m or n must be divisible by prime 2. thus the divisibility testdiectlygives you the answer that then anyone of them must be an even number.