A Proving that Levi-Civita tensor density is invariant

baba26
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
It's a problem from the textbook Supergravity ( Freedman, Proeyen ). We are asked to prove that under any infinitesimal change in frame-fields, there is no change in the Levi-Civita tensor density i.e. the variation equals zero.
This is a problem from the textbook Supergravity ( by Daniel Z. Freedman and Antoine Van Proeyen ). I am trying to learn general relativity from this book. I am attempting to do the later part of the Exercise 7.14 ( on page 148 ). Basically it asks us to explicitly show that the Levi-Civita tensor density doesn't change under any variation of frame fields. I am supposed to use the formula: variation of determiant of matrix M = determinant * trace ( M_inverse * variation in M ). But I can not even think of how to begin with the problem. Any hint will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the frame field you have ##\delta e = e e^{\mu}_a \delta e^a_{\mu}## where ##e = \mathrm{det}(e^{\mu}_a)##, which you can use when you take the variation of ##\epsilon^{a_1 \dots} = e \epsilon^{b_1 \dots} ({e^{a_1}}_{b_1})(\dots)##
 
That ##\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}## is a actually a tensor is confirmed by the identity for the determinant of a ##4\times 4## matrix that

\begin{equation}

\epsilon'^{\mu'\nu'\rho'\sigma'}{\rm Det[L]}=L^{\mu'}_{\mu} L^{\nu'}_{\nu} L^{\rho'}_{\rho} L^{\sigma'}_{\sigma}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}.

\end{equation}

This shows that ##\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}## is an idempotent pseudotensor of rank four.
 
Last edited:
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top