Proving that limit of 1/x as x approaches 0 does not exist

  • Thread starter Thread starter Seydlitz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit of the function \( f(x) = \frac{1}{x} \) as \( x \) approaches 0 does not exist (DNE). To prove this, one can demonstrate that the left-hand limit and right-hand limit are not equal. Specifically, for any real number \( l \) chosen as a candidate for the limit, it is possible to find an \( x \) such that \( 0 < |x| < \delta \) and \( |\frac{1}{x} - l| > 1 \). This confirms that \( f(x) \) becomes infinitely large as \( x \) approaches 0, thus satisfying the conditions for proving that the limit does not exist.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limit definitions in calculus
  • Familiarity with the epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Knowledge of one-sided limits
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in detail
  • Learn about one-sided limits and their implications
  • Explore examples of limits that do not exist
  • Practice proving limits using various functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on limits and continuity, as well as educators looking for clear examples of limit proofs.

Seydlitz
Messages
262
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


This is the classical problem of proving that ##\lim_{x \to 0} f(x) = DNE\text{ where }f(x)=\frac{1}{x}##

I know there are many solutions to this problem but I just want to do it myself with your hints from scratch.

The Attempt at a Solution


If we want to prove that a limit does not exist we can show the negation of the limit definition or show that the limit from left and right are not equal.

The negation of the limit definition basically boils down to the fact that there is some ##x## which satisfies ##0<|x-a|<\delta## but not ##|f(x)-l|<\epsilon##, alternatively it satisfies ##|f(x)-l|>\epsilon##. I'm a bit lost on how to find this ##x## rigorously. It seems that there are always many different methods but I still can't get the feel of it intuitively.

What is clear to me is this will always be true ##0<|x|<\delta## and the function will go very large as delta is reduced. That means it doesn't satisfy the ##|f(x)-l|<\epsilon## condition and that ##|\frac{1}{x}-l|>\epsilon## But what is ##l## in this case and how to complete the proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Choose any real number l as a candidate for the limit, and find an x, 0 &lt; |x| &lt; \delta such that \frac{1}{x} - l &gt; 1. This should be easy since, as you said, 1/x becomes infinitely large in absolute value (but you have to prove this).

Since the limit obviously does not exist, it makes no sense to ask about "what l is". ;)
 
Boorglar said:
Choose any real number l as a candidate for the limit, and find an x, 0 &lt; |x| &lt; \delta such that \frac{1}{x} - l &gt; 1. This should be easy since, as you said, 1/x becomes infinitely large in absolute value (but you have to prove this).

Since the limit obviously does not exist, it makes no sense to ask about "what l is". ;)

Hmm I guess we can have ##x## smaller than ##\delta## and ##\frac{1}{\epsilon+|l|}##. The absolute value around should make sure that the inequality work if x is negative or positive. Is this correct?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K