Proving the Bisectors of a Quadrilateral Bisect Each Other

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gib Z
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that the bisectors of a quadrilateral bisect each other. The original poster describes a quadrilateral with two lines connecting opposite sides that bisect those sides.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to assign specific lengths to the sides of the quadrilateral to simplify the proof. They express uncertainty about the relationships between angles and the properties of the bisectors.
  • Some participants question whether Cartesian coordinates can be used in the proof, suggesting that setting up a coordinate system might facilitate finding the intersection of the bisectors.
  • Others note the potential complexity of using Cartesian coordinates, indicating that the calculations may become cumbersome.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods to approach the problem. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach, but the use of Cartesian coordinates is being considered as a viable option despite concerns about complexity.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention that the course does not impose strict limitations on the methods used, allowing for more advanced techniques as long as they are understandable to the teacher.

Gib Z
Homework Helper
Messages
3,341
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



A quadrilateral is given, and inside it connecting opposite sides are 2 lines which bisect the sides they connect. Prove that the bisectors bisect each other.

Homework Equations


None.


The Attempt at a Solution



Well I gave the sides lengths of 2q, 2r, 2s and 2p so that when it was bisected the lengths would be nice.

I know that the bisectors are not necessarily parallel to any side, which if they were the proof would be simple. None of the angles are necessarily equal or even related in any way other than that they all add up to 2pi.

I also realized that the bisectors are necessarily perpendicular to each other. It seems all I do is show what I can't assume! I also tried to draw out pairs of sides to a certain point to form a big triangle, because I thought I might be able to do something with similarity, but to no avail. Euclidean geometry is obviously not my forte.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this just a "regular" geometry course or are you allowed to use Cartesian coordinates? The way I would do this would be to set up a coordinate system so that one vertex was at (0,0) and the others at (a, 0), (b, c), and (d,e). Find the coordinates of the midpoints of the sides (easy), find the equations of the bisecting lines (only a little harder) and find the point where the lines intersect.
 
It's not really any course in particular, and teachers don't mark students down for using more advanced methods unless the teacher can not follow, so I'm sure using Cartesian coordinates will work out great, although it looks like the working might get a tiny bit messy, I'll do it now.
 
Ok well My working is well over 3 pages long now, me expression for the x value of the point of intersection is 4 lines long, and once I find that point, I have to put that into the distance formula a few times. I think they intended for a different method :(
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K