Proving the Hermitian Conjugate Property of Operators

  • Thread starter Thread starter buraqenigma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hermitian Operator
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
6 replies · 4K views
buraqenigma
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
How can i show that [tex](a_{1} A_{1}+a_{2} A_{2})^{\dagger}=a_{1}^{\ast} A_{1}^{\dagger}+a_{2}^{\ast} A_{2}^{\dagger}[/tex]

notice: [tex]a_{1},a_{2}\in C[/tex] and [tex]A_{1}^{\dagger},A_{2}^{\dagger}[/tex] are hermitian conjugate of [tex]A_{1},A_{2}[/tex] operators
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the [itex]\dagger[/itex] to denote the adjoint. Since you're considering the case of bounded operators, just apply the definition of the adjoint operator for a bounded operator.
 
Thanks But ?

Thank you for your correction.

I want to know that to show this equations must i use boundered operator.Can i use unbounded (going to +-infinity) operator to show this.
 
Let's take for example [itex]A_{1}, A_{2}:\mathcal{H}\longrightarrow \mathcal{H}[/itex] and [itex]\phi,\psi\in\mathcal{H}[/itex]. Then the adjoints of the operators exist and are defined everywhere in [itex]\mathcal{H}[/itex] and the same could be said of the sum operator and its adjoint.

[tex]\langle \phi,left(a_{1}A_{1}+a_{2}A_{2}\right)\psi\rangle[/tex] is the object that you should start from.
 
I tried something.Is it regular?

[tex]\left\langle\phi|(a_{1}A_{1}+a_{2}A_{2})^{\dagger}\psi\right\rangle = \left\langle(a_{1}A_{1}+a_{2}A_{2}) \phi|\psi\right\rangle[/tex] then [tex]\left\langle\phi|(a_{1}A_{1}+a_{2}A_{2})^{\dagger}\psi\right\rangle =\left\langle(a_{1}A_{1})\phi|\psi\right\rangle + \left\langle(a_{2}A_{2})\phi|\psi\right\rangle[/tex] so [tex]\left\langle\phi|(a_{1}A_{1}+a_{2}A_{2})^{\dagger}\psi\right\rangle =a_{1}^\ast \left\langle A_{1}\phi|\psi\right\rangle + a_{2}^\ast \left\langle A_{2}\phi|\psi\right\rangle[/tex] in the end
[tex]\left\langle\phi|(a_{1} A_{1}+a_{2}A_{2})^{\dagger}\psi\right\rangle =a_{1}^\ast \left\langle \phi|A_{1}^\dagger \psi\right\rangle + a_{2}^\ast \left\langle \phi|A_{2}^\dagger \psi\right\rangle[/tex] becauuse of [tex]a \left\langle\phi| \psi\right\rangle = \left\langle\phi|a \psi\right\rangle[/tex](a is complex constant) we can write [tex]\left\langle\phi|(a_{1} A_{1}+a_{2}A_{2})^{\dagger}\psi\right\rangle = \left\langle \phi|a_{1}^\ast A_{1}^\dagger \psi\right\rangle + \left\langle \phi|a_{2}^\ast A_{2}^\dagger \psi\right\rangle[/tex] in the end [tex]\left\langle\phi|(a_{1} A_{1}+a_{2}A_{2})^{\dagger}\psi\right\rangle = \left\langle \phi|(a_{1}^\ast A_{1}^\dagger + a_{2}^\ast A_{2}^\dagger) \psi\right\rangle[/tex]. we 've showed that [tex](a_{1} A_{1}+a_{2}A_{2})^{\dagger} = a_{1}^\ast A_{1}^\dagger + a_{2}^\ast A_{2}^\dagger[/tex]
 
Last edited:
It looks okay. For the first equality that you wrote you used that [itex]A^{\dagger\dagger}=A[/itex] which is okay for bounded operators in Hilbert spaces.
 
Thank you for your help. see you later in another problem.