Proving the Limit of (3n+5)/2(n+1)^2 is 0 as n Approaches Infinity

  • Thread starter Thread starter bedi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the limit of the expression (3n+5)/2(n+1)^2 approaches 0 as n approaches infinity. The subject area includes calculus and limit evaluation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss finding an appropriate N to satisfy the limit condition for any ε>0. There are attempts to manipulate the expression to simplify the limit evaluation. Questions arise about whether certain terms can be ignored in the limit process and how to apply the Archimedean property to establish limits.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on how to approach the limit proof, while others are exploring different interpretations of the terms involved. There is a collaborative effort to clarify the reasoning behind ignoring certain terms and confirming that the limit of specific components is indeed 0.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of proving limits as part of a homework assignment, which may influence their approaches and the assumptions they are questioning.

bedi
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Prove that the limit of (3n+5)/2(n+1)^2 is 0 when n goes to infinity.

Attempt: I need to find an N such that for any €>0, (3n+5)/2(n+1)^2<€ holds for every n with n>N.

Then I made some manipulation;

(3n+5)/2(n+1)^2 < (3n+5)/(2n^2 +4n) < (3n+6)/(2n^2 +4n) = (n+3)/(n^2 +2n) < (n+3)/n^2

Then what? Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi bedi! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)

= n/n2 + 3/n2 ? :smile:

(btw, you could have started (3n+3)/2(n+1)2 + 2/2(n+1)2 :wink:)
 
Alright, then should I ignore 3/n2?
 
bedi said:
Alright, then should I ignore 3/n2?

nooo, you should prove that its limit is 0 ! :smile:
 
So I choose N such that 1/N<ε, which is permitted by the Archimedean property. Hence 1/n<1/N<ε. This proves that the limit of the first term is 0. To show that the limit of 3/n2 is also 0, I can use the same argument, can't I?
 
yup! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K