Proving the Limit of Cosine Squared: $\mathbb{Q}$ vs. Non-$\mathbb{Q}$

In summary: Q} \\0& x \not\in \mathbb{Q}\end{cases} In summary, the equation states that if x is a real number within the range of -1 to 1, then there is a likelihood that x is either equal to 1 or not in the range of -1 to 1.
  • #1
Lisa91
29
0
[tex]\lim_{n\to\infty} \left (\lim_{k\to\infty} \cos (\left| n! \pi x\right|) ^{2k} \right) = \begin{cases} 1&x \in \mathbb{Q} \\0& x \not\in \mathbb{Q}\end{cases} [/tex]. How to prove it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Lisa91 said:
[tex]\lim_{n\to\infty} \left (\lim_{k\to\infty} \cos (\left| n! \pi x\right|) ^{2k} \right) = \left\{\begin{array}{l} 1 x \in \mathbb{Q}\\1 x \not\in \mathbb{Q}\end{array}\right. [/tex]. How to prove it?

Hi Lisa91, :)

I think there is a typo in the right hand side of the equation. What do you mean by \(1x\)? Is it,

[tex]\lim_{n\to\infty} \left (\lim_{k\to\infty} \cos (\left| n! \pi x\right|) ^{2k} \right) = \left\{\begin{array}{l} x \in \mathbb{Q}\\1 \not\in \mathbb{Q}\end{array}\right. [/tex]

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
  • #3
Lisa91 said:
[tex]\lim_{n\to\infty} \left (\lim_{k\to\infty} \cos (\left| n! \pi x\right|) ^{2k} \right) = \left\{\begin{array}{l} 1 \in \mathbb{Q}\\ 0 \not\in \mathbb{Q}\end{array}\right. [/tex]. How to prove it?

With great probability Lisa intends the Diriclet function defined as in...

Dirichlet Function -- from Wolfram MathWorld

$\displaystyle D(x)= \lim_{m \rightarrow \infty} \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \cos^ {2 n} (m!\ \pi\ x) = \left\{\begin{array}{l} 1 \in \mathbb{Q}\\ 0 \not\in \mathbb{Q}\end{array}\right.$ (1)

The 'proof' is relatively easy because if $x \in \mathbb{Q}$ then $x=\frac{p}{q}$ with p and q integer coprimes. Now if $m \rightarrow \infty$ for a certain $m>m_{0}$ q divides m! and it will be $\cos (m!\ \pi\ x) = \pm 1$. Anyway I personally have more than one doubt on the 'logical architecture' of the definition of the Diriclet Function...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
  • #4
[tex]\lim_{n\to\infty} \left (\lim_{k\to\infty} \cos (\left| n! \pi x\right|) ^{2k} \right) = \begin{cases} 1&x \in \mathbb{Q} \\0& x \not\in \mathbb{Q}\end{cases} [/tex]

No, this '2k' has to be in the place I wrote.
 
  • #5
Lisa91 said:
[tex]\lim_{n\to\infty} \left (\lim_{k\to\infty} \cos (\left| n! \pi x\right|) ^{2k} \right) = \begin{cases} 1&x \in \mathbb{Q} \\0& x \not\in \mathbb{Q}\end{cases} [/tex]

No, this '2k' has to be in the place I wrote.

Also in this case if x is rational for any $n>n_{0}$ the term $n!\ x$ is an even integer so that for any k is $\cos \{(n!\ \pi\ x)^{2k}\}=1$. The problem however is when x is irrational because in this case [probably...] $\cos \{(n!\ \pi\ x)^{2k}\}$ has no limits in n and k... Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$
 

Related to Proving the Limit of Cosine Squared: $\mathbb{Q}$ vs. Non-$\mathbb{Q}$

1. What is the limit of cosine squared?

The limit of cosine squared is equal to 1 as x approaches infinity.

2. Why is it important to prove the limit of cosine squared?

Proving the limit of cosine squared is important because it helps us understand the behavior of this trigonometric function and its relationship with other mathematical concepts.

3. What is the difference between proving the limit for rational numbers (Q) and non-rational numbers (non-Q)?

The main difference is in the approach used to prove the limit. For rational numbers, we can use algebraic manipulation and properties of limits to prove the limit of cosine squared. However, for non-rational numbers, we need to use more advanced techniques such as the Squeeze Theorem or the ε-δ definition of a limit.

4. Can the limit of cosine squared be proven for all real numbers?

Yes, the limit of cosine squared can be proven for all real numbers. This is because the cosine function is defined for all real numbers and its square will always be positive, hence approaching 1 as x approaches infinity.

5. What is the significance of proving the limit of cosine squared for non-rational numbers?

Proving the limit of cosine squared for non-rational numbers is significant because it expands our understanding of limits and allows us to apply more advanced techniques in mathematical analysis. It also helps us to better understand the behavior of trigonometric functions and their relationship with other mathematical concepts.

Similar threads

  • Calculus
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
997
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
577
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
900
Back
Top