Proving the Maximum Volume of a Rectangular Parallelepiped: A Geometric Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter John O' Meara
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum Volume
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The maximum volume of a rectangular parallelepiped with a fixed surface area occurs when it is configured as a cube. The volume (v) is defined as v = l * w * h, while the surface area (s) is given by s = 2lw + 2lh + 2wh, which remains constant. To prove this, one can utilize the method of Lagrange multipliers to maximize the volume function under the surface area constraint. The discussion highlights the relationship between the dimensions of the parallelepiped and the conditions for maximizing volume through calculus techniques.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts, including partial derivatives
  • Familiarity with the method of Lagrange multipliers
  • Knowledge of geometric properties of rectangular parallelepipeds
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving volume and surface area
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of Lagrange multipliers in detail
  • Explore the geometric properties of cubes and their optimization
  • Learn about partial derivatives and their applications in optimization problems
  • Investigate the relationship between surface area and volume in three-dimensional shapes
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineering students, and anyone interested in geometric optimization problems will benefit from this discussion.

John O' Meara
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
Prove that the maximum volume of a rectangular parallelepiped with a fixed surface area is when it is a cube.

Volume = v, length = l, width = w, height = h and surface area = s. Then we have: v = l*w*h = h^3. s = 2*w*l + 2*w*h + 2*h*l = constant = 6*h^2.

For a maximum to exist (\frac{{\partial ^2 y}}{{\partial x^2 }})(\frac{{\partial^2 y}}{{\partial x^2}}) - (\frac{{\partial^2 y}}{{\partial x}{\partial t }}) > 0.

Where x, y and t are unknown to me. I just need some help to get started. Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you might try using the method of Lagrange multipliers, maximizing f(l, w, h) = v under the condtion that \phi (l, w, h)= s where v and s are constants with the multiplier \lamda.
 
Last edited:
The book that I am using is an introduction to Calculus, which does not have Lagrange multipliers in it. So by asking this question, it would imply that the question can be done without recourse to Lagrange multipliers. So I would think.
Anyway thanks for the reply.
 
Okay, You know that the surface area of a given x by y by z parallelogram is 2xy+ 2xz+ 2yz= A and the volume is V= xyz.
From 2xy+ 2xz+ 2yz= A, you know that z(2x+2y)= A- 2xy so z= (A- 2xy)/(2x+ 2y). That means that, as a function of x and y, V= xy((A- 2xy)/(2x+ 2y))

Now, what does that tell you?
 
I can do the following: \frac{{\partial V}}{{\partial x }} = 0 \\ and \frac{{ \partial V}}{{\partial y}} = 0 \\, and then solve for x and y. To find that x^2 = Y^2 \\. Then I can find an expression for V in terms of z and y only, then \frac{{ \partial V}}{{\partial z}} = 0 \\ and solve for y and z to get: y^2 = z^2 Thanks for the reply.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
15K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K