Benzoate said:
This method seems circular.
no, it's no circular. He was explaining to you that you must use the definition of the (left) inverse. I.e., for any element [tex]g^{}[/tex] of the group, the inverse [tex]g^{-1}[/tex] satisfies
[tex]
g^{-1}\cdot g = e[/tex]
where the symbol [tex]e^{}[/tex] stands of the identity element of the group.
Maybe the notation [tex]g^{-1}[/tex] for the inverse of [tex]g[/tex] is too familiar for its own good. You could try a different notation. For example, you could denote the inverse of [tex]g[/tex] as
[tex]\bar g[/tex]. Then, the definition of the inverse says that
[tex]
\bar g \cdot g = e[/tex]
To prove the equality you mentioned, first simply rename the element [tex]g[/tex] to [tex]\bar a[/tex] (which is an element of the group if [tex]a[/tex] is, by definition) to see that
[tex]
\bar \bar a \cdot \bar a = e[/tex]
(which is just using the definition of inverse for [tex]\bar a[/tex]).
Next, rename the element [tex]g[/tex] to [tex]a[/tex] to see that
[tex]
\bar a \cdot a = e[/tex]
(which, is just using the definition of inverse for a).
If you multiply the above equation on the left by [tex]\bar \bar a[/tex] and the equation two-above on the right by [tex]a[/tex] you will see that the LH sides are equal and thus the RH sides are also equal which gives you the equality you desire.