Proving the Renormalization of Phi^4 Theory: A Challenge for Mr. Fogg

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the renormalization of phi^4 theory, specifically focusing on proving an identity found in Peskin & Schröder's text. Participants explore the mathematical steps involved in deriving a logarithmic term in the context of quantum field theory.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Mr. Fogg expresses difficulty in understanding the renormalization process and notes that important steps are omitted in the texts he consulted.
  • Another participant suggests reading Srednicki's book, claiming it provides more detailed steps.
  • Mr. Fogg derives an expression but questions its equivalence to the one in Peskin & Schröder.
  • A later reply asserts that the expressions are equivalent and suggests a method to simplify the derived expression using logarithmic properties.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the equivalence of the expressions derived by Mr. Fogg and the one in Peskin & Schröder, as Mr. Fogg remains uncertain about how to proceed to obtain the final form.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential gaps in understanding the derivation process, including the handling of logarithmic terms and the application of mathematical identities. There is an indication of dependence on the definitions and interpretations of terms used in the equations.

Phileas.Fogg
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hello,
to understand the renormalization of phi^4 theory, I read Peskin Schröder and Ryder. In both books important steps are left out. I found the following identity in Peskin Schöder "An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory" on page page 808, equation A.52 (Appendix)

\frac{\Gamma(2 - \frac{d}{2})}{(4\pi)^{\frac{d}{2}}} \left( \frac{1}{\Delta} \right)^{2-\frac{d}{2}} = \frac{1}{(4\pi)^2} \left( \frac{2}{\epsilon} - log(\Delta) - \gamma + log(4\pi) + O(\epsilon)\right)

Now I want to prove that explicitly, but I don't know how to start and how the logarithm on the right hand side appears.

Could anyone help me?

Regards,
Mr. Fogg
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Phileas.Fogg said:
to understand the renormalization of phi^4 theory, I read Peskin Schröder and Ryder. In both books important steps are left out.

That's why you should read a book like Srednicki that doesn't leave steps out.

For any nonzero A and small x,

A^x=\exp(x\ln A)=1+x\ln A + O(x^2)

\Gamma(x) = {1\over x}-\gamma+O(x)

These are equations 14.33 and 14.26 in Srednicki.
 
Last edited:


Thank You,

so I get this expression:

\frac{1}{(4\pi)^2} \left( \frac{2}{\epsilon} - \gamma \right) \left(1 + \frac{\epsilon}{2} ln(\frac{4 \pi}{\Delta})\right)

But that's not the equation from Peskin & Schröder, isn't it?

How do I go on to get it finally?

Regards,
Mr. Fogg
 


It's the same. Just multiply it out, and use ln(a/b)=ln(a)-ln(b).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K