I Proving the Schrodinger Equation

thegroundhog
Messages
16
Reaction score
10
TL;DR Summary
How were scientists able to do experiments to prove that the Schrodinger equation was correct?
How did scientists prove the accuracy of Schrodinger's equation to describe the behaviour of subatomic particles, especially in the 1920s? How do you monitor an electron's momentum and position when they are so small? Also, if the Schrodinger equation just describes probabilities, is the accuracy of the experimenting based on doing the same measurements over and over to make sure the probabilities are correct (in the same way to check the heads/tails probability of a coin, the more measurements the better, as it will tend towards 50%)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thegroundhog said:
Summary:: How were scientists able to do experiments to prove that the Schrodinger equation was correct?

How did scientists prove the accuracy of Schrodinger's equation to describe the behaviour of subatomic particles, especially in the 1920s? How do you monitor an electron's momentum and position when they are so small? Also, if the Schrodinger equation just describes probabilities, is the accuracy of the experimenting based on doing the same measurements over and over to make sure the probabilities are correct (in the same way to check the heads/tails probability of a coin, the more measurements the better, as it will tend towards 50%)?
You probably need to read the history of QM to clarify the exact sequence of events. In modern QM, the Schrodinger equation can be derived from some expected properties of the time evolution operator: see, for example, Modern Quantum Mechanics by J..J. Sakurai.

The acid test is not direct measurements of an electron, but the prediction of the atomic spectra for hydrogen etc. In this case, even the different energy levels themselves are not measured directly but inferred from the atom's spectrum (i.e. the measurement is of the wavelength (or frequency) of the emission and absorption spectrum).
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and vanhees71
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Back
Top