I Proving the Schrodinger Equation

thegroundhog
Messages
16
Reaction score
10
TL;DR Summary
How were scientists able to do experiments to prove that the Schrodinger equation was correct?
How did scientists prove the accuracy of Schrodinger's equation to describe the behaviour of subatomic particles, especially in the 1920s? How do you monitor an electron's momentum and position when they are so small? Also, if the Schrodinger equation just describes probabilities, is the accuracy of the experimenting based on doing the same measurements over and over to make sure the probabilities are correct (in the same way to check the heads/tails probability of a coin, the more measurements the better, as it will tend towards 50%)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thegroundhog said:
Summary:: How were scientists able to do experiments to prove that the Schrodinger equation was correct?

How did scientists prove the accuracy of Schrodinger's equation to describe the behaviour of subatomic particles, especially in the 1920s? How do you monitor an electron's momentum and position when they are so small? Also, if the Schrodinger equation just describes probabilities, is the accuracy of the experimenting based on doing the same measurements over and over to make sure the probabilities are correct (in the same way to check the heads/tails probability of a coin, the more measurements the better, as it will tend towards 50%)?
You probably need to read the history of QM to clarify the exact sequence of events. In modern QM, the Schrodinger equation can be derived from some expected properties of the time evolution operator: see, for example, Modern Quantum Mechanics by J..J. Sakurai.

The acid test is not direct measurements of an electron, but the prediction of the atomic spectra for hydrogen etc. In this case, even the different energy levels themselves are not measured directly but inferred from the atom's spectrum (i.e. the measurement is of the wavelength (or frequency) of the emission and absorption spectrum).
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and vanhees71
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top