MHB Proving the Uniform Distribution of Y from Independent Random Variables X

bennyzadir
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Let be $X_1, X_2, ..., X_n, ... $ independent identically distributed random variables with mutual distribution $ \mathbb{P}\{X_i=0\}=1-\mathbb{P}\{X_i=1\}=p $. Let be $ Y:= \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}2^{-n}X_n$.
a) Prove that if $p=\frac{1}{2}$ then Y is uniformly distributed on interval [0,1].
b) Show that if $p \neq \frac{1}{2}$ then the distribution function of random variable Y is continuous but not absolutely continuous and it is singular (i.e. singular with respect to the Lebesque measure, i.e with respect to the uniform distribution).

I would really appreciate if you could help me!
Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zadir said:
Let be $X_1, X_2, ..., X_n, ... $ independent identically distributed random variables with mutual distribution $ \mathbb{P}\{X_i=0\}=1-\mathbb{P}\{X_i=1\}=p $. Let be $ Y:= \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}2^{-n}X_n$.
a) Prove that if $p=\frac{1}{2}$ then Y is uniformly distributed on interval [0,1].
b) Show that if $p \neq \frac{1}{2}$ then the distribution function of random variable Y is continuous but not absolutely continuous and it is singular (i.e. singular with respect to the Lebesque measure, i.e with respect to the uniform distribution).
I would really appreciate if you could help me!
Thank you in advance!

If You set $\varphi_{n}(x)$ the p.d.f. of each $X_{n}$ and set $\Phi_{n}(\omega)=\mathcal {F} \{\varphi_{n}(x)\}$ You have that the p.d.f. of $\displaystyle Y=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} 2^{-n}\ X_{n}$ is...

$\displaystyle \Phi(\omega)= \prod_{n=1}^{\infty} \Phi_{n}(\omega)$ (1)

If $p=\frac{1}{2}$ is...

$\displaystyle \varphi_{n} (x)= \frac{1}{2}\ \delta(x) + \frac{1}{2}\ \delta(x-\frac{1}{2^{n}}) \implies \Phi_{n}(\omega)= e^{- i \frac{\omega}{2^{n+1}}}\ \cos \frac {\omega}{2^{n}}$ (2)

Now You have to remember that is...

$\displaystyle \frac{\sin \omega}{\omega}= \prod_{n=1}^{\infty} \cos \frac{\omega}{2^{n}}$ (3)

... to obtain from (1) and (2)...

$\displaystyle \Phi(\omega)= e^{-i\ \frac{\omega}{2}}\ \frac{\sin \omega}{\omega}$ (4)

... so that Y is uniformly distributed between 0 and 1...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your answer. Do you have any idea for part b) ?
 
If $p \ne \frac{1}{2}$ the task becomes a little more complex. In that case You have...

$\displaystyle \varphi_{n}(x)= p\ \delta(x) + (1-p)\ \delta (x-\frac{1}{2^{n}}) \implies \Phi_{n} (\omega)= (1-p)\ e^{- i \frac{\omega}{2^{n}}}\ (1+ \frac{p}{1-p}\ e^{i \frac{\omega}{2^{n}}})$ (1)

... and now You have to valuate the 'infinite product'...

$\displaystyle \Phi(\omega)= \prod_{n=1}^{\infty} \Phi_{n}(\omega)$ (2)

What You can demonstrate is that the infinite product (2) converges because converges the term...

$\displaystyle \prod_{n=1}^{\infty} (1+ \frac{p}{1-p}\ e^{i \frac{\omega}{2^{n}}})$ (3)

... and that is true because converges the series...

$\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} e^{i \frac{\omega}{2^{n}}}$ (4)

The effective computation of (2) is a different task that requires a little of efforts...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top