Proving the Zero Lebesgue Measure of Continuous Real Functions: Guidance Needed

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure Zero
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the 2-dimensional Lebesgue measure of the graph of a continuous real function is zero. Participants emphasize that the graph, denoted as G, is a closed subset of A × A, where A is a subset of real numbers. The Fubini theorem is highlighted as a key tool to demonstrate that m²(G) = 0 by integrating the measure of the x-sections of G. Additionally, alternative methods using uniform continuity are suggested for cases where the Lebesgue integral is not yet covered.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuous functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of Lebesgue measure
  • Knowledge of the Fubini theorem
  • Basic principles of topology, specifically closed sets
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Fubini theorem in detail to understand its application in measure theory
  • Explore the properties of Lebesgue measure and its implications for continuous functions
  • Learn about uniform continuity and its role in proving measure properties
  • Investigate alternative proofs for the zero measure of graphs of continuous functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in measure theory and the properties of continuous functions.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I have the following exercise..

Show that the $2$-dimensional Lebesgue measure of the graph of a continuous real function is zero.

Could you give some hints what I could do?? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

I have the following exercise..

Show that the $2$-dimensional Lebesgue measure of the graph of a continuous real function is zero.

Could you give some hints what I could do?? (Wondering)

Hi mathmari,

Let $G$ be the graph of a continuous function $f : A \to \Bbb R$, where $A\subset \Bbb R$. Show that $G$ is a closed subset of $A \times A$. Since $G$ is closed, it is measurable. So you can use the Fubini theorem to show that $m^2(G) = 0$.
 
Euge said:
Hi mathmari,

Let $G$ be the graph of a continuous function $f : A \to \Bbb R$, where $A\subset \Bbb R$. Show that $G$ is a closed subset of $A \times A$. Since $G$ is closed, it is measurable. So you can use the Fubini theorem to show that $m^2(G) = 0$.

To show that $G$ is a closed subset of $A\times A$ I did the following:

Let $G=\{(x,f(x))|x\in A\}$ be the graph of the continuous function $f$.

Since $f$ is continuous for each convergent subsequence $x_k\rightarrow x$ we have that $f(x_k) \rightarrow f(x)$.

Therefore, each sequence of the form $(x_n, f(xn))\in G$ converges to $(x,f(x))\in G$.

So, the graph is a closed subset of $A\times A$.

Is this correct?? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
To show that $G$ is a closed subset of $A\times A$ I did the following:

Let $G=\{(x,f(x))|x\in A\}$ be the graph of the continuous function $f$.

Since $f$ is continuous for each convergent subsequence $x_k\rightarrow x$ we have that $f(x_k) \rightarrow f(x)$.

Therefore, each sequence of the form $(x_n, f(xn))\in G$ converges to $(x,f(x))\in G$.

So, the graph is a closed subset of $A\times A$.

Is this correct?? (Wondering)

No, it's incorrect, but you have some good ideas. To show that $G$ is a closed subset of $A\times A$, start by taking an arbitrary limit point $(x,y)\in A\times A$ and show that $(x,y)\in G$, i.e., $y = f(x)$. Being a limit point of $G$, $(x,y)$ is the limit of a sequence $(x_k, f(x_k))$ in $G$. Thus $x_k\to x$ and $f(x_k)\to y$. Use continuity of $f$ to deduce $f(x) = y$.
 
Euge said:
No, it's incorrect, but you have some good ideas. To show that $G$ is a closed subset of $A\times A$, start by taking an arbitrary limit point $(x,y)\in A\times A$ and show that $(x,y)\in G$, i.e., $y = f(x)$. Being a limit point of $G$, $(x,y)$ is the limit of a sequence $(x_k, f(x_k))$ in $G$. Thus $x_k\to x$ and $f(x_k)\to y$. Use continuity of $f$ to deduce $f(x) = y$.

I got stuck right now... (Worried)

When we take $(x,y)\in A\times A$ and we show that $(x,y)\in G$, do we not show in that way that $A\times A$ is a subset of $G$ ?? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
I got stuck right now... (Worried)

When we take $(x,y)\in A\times A$ and we show that $(x,y)\in G$, do we not show in that way that $A\times A$ is a subset of $G$ ?? (Wondering)

No, we didn't pick an arbitrary point in $A \times A$, but an arbitrary limit point of $G$, which lies in $A\times A$.
 
Euge said:
No, we didn't pick an arbitrary point in $A \times A$, but an arbitrary limit point of $G$, which lies in $A\times A$.

Ahaa.. OK!

Euge said:
Let $G$ be the graph of a continuous function $f : A \to \Bbb R$, where $A\subset \Bbb R$. Show that $G$ is a closed subset of $A \times A$. Since $G$ is closed, it is measurable. So you can use the Fubini theorem to show that $m^2(G) = 0$.

Could you explain me how I could use the Fubini theorem to show that $m^2(G)=0$ ?? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Could you explain me how I could use the Fubini theorem to show that $m^2(G)=0$ ?? (Wondering)

The $x$-section of $G$ is $G^x = \{y\, :\, y = f(x)\} = \{f(x)\}$. So $m^1(G^x) = 0$ for all $x$. Hence by Fubini's theorem, $m^2(G) = \int m^1(G^x)\, dx = \int 0\, dx = 0$.
 
Euge said:
The $x$-section of $G$ is $G^x = \{y\, :\, y = f(x)\} = \{f(x)\}$. So $m^1(G^x) = 0$ for all $x$. Hence by Fubini's theorem, $m^2(G) = \int m^1(G^x)\, dx = \int 0\, dx = 0$.

Since the Lebesgue integral is in the next chapter, is there an other way to show it, besides using Fubini's Theorem?? (Wondering)
 
  • #10
mathmari said:
Since the Lebesgue integral is in the next chapter, is there an other way to show it, besides using Fubini's Theorem?? (Wondering)

Before that, let me ask you this. What was the domain of $f$ supposed to be?
 
  • #11
Euge said:
Before that, let me ask you this. What was the domain of $f$ supposed to be?

I don't know... (Wondering) The exercise says nothing about the domain of $f$...
 
  • #12
mathmari said:
I don't know... (Wondering) The exercise says nothing about the domain of $f$...

Let's suppose the domain of $f$ is $\Bbb R$, so that $G = \{(x,y)\in \Bbb R^2\, |\, y = f(x)\}$. For each $n\in \Bbb N$, let $G_n = \{(x,y)\in G \, |\, |x| \le n\}$. Then $$G = \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty G_n$$. Using uniform continuity arguments, show that $m^2(G_n) = 0$ for all $n\in \Bbb N$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K