Proving the Zero Lebesgue Measure of Continuous Real Functions: Guidance Needed

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure Zero
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the 2-dimensional Lebesgue measure of the graph of a continuous real function is zero. Participants explore various approaches, including the application of the Fubini theorem and properties of closed sets, while seeking hints and clarifications on the exercise.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for hints on how to show that the 2-dimensional Lebesgue measure of the graph of a continuous function is zero.
  • Another participant suggests showing that the graph is a closed subset of \(A \times A\) and mentions using the Fubini theorem to conclude that \(m^2(G) = 0\).
  • A participant provides reasoning for why the graph is closed, referencing the continuity of the function and the convergence of sequences.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the correctness of their reasoning regarding closed sets and limit points.
  • There is a discussion about the use of the Fubini theorem, with one participant asking for alternative methods to show the measure is zero without relying on it.
  • Another participant proposes assuming the domain of the function is \(\mathbb{R}\) and suggests using uniform continuity arguments to show that the measure of subsets \(G_n\) is zero.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach of showing the graph is a closed set and using the Fubini theorem, but there is no consensus on alternative methods or the specifics of the function's domain.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of information regarding the domain of the function, which may affect the application of certain arguments. There are also unresolved questions about the correctness of specific reasoning related to closed sets and limit points.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and individuals interested in measure theory, particularly those studying properties of continuous functions and their graphs in the context of Lebesgue measure.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I have the following exercise..

Show that the $2$-dimensional Lebesgue measure of the graph of a continuous real function is zero.

Could you give some hints what I could do?? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

I have the following exercise..

Show that the $2$-dimensional Lebesgue measure of the graph of a continuous real function is zero.

Could you give some hints what I could do?? (Wondering)

Hi mathmari,

Let $G$ be the graph of a continuous function $f : A \to \Bbb R$, where $A\subset \Bbb R$. Show that $G$ is a closed subset of $A \times A$. Since $G$ is closed, it is measurable. So you can use the Fubini theorem to show that $m^2(G) = 0$.
 
Euge said:
Hi mathmari,

Let $G$ be the graph of a continuous function $f : A \to \Bbb R$, where $A\subset \Bbb R$. Show that $G$ is a closed subset of $A \times A$. Since $G$ is closed, it is measurable. So you can use the Fubini theorem to show that $m^2(G) = 0$.

To show that $G$ is a closed subset of $A\times A$ I did the following:

Let $G=\{(x,f(x))|x\in A\}$ be the graph of the continuous function $f$.

Since $f$ is continuous for each convergent subsequence $x_k\rightarrow x$ we have that $f(x_k) \rightarrow f(x)$.

Therefore, each sequence of the form $(x_n, f(xn))\in G$ converges to $(x,f(x))\in G$.

So, the graph is a closed subset of $A\times A$.

Is this correct?? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
To show that $G$ is a closed subset of $A\times A$ I did the following:

Let $G=\{(x,f(x))|x\in A\}$ be the graph of the continuous function $f$.

Since $f$ is continuous for each convergent subsequence $x_k\rightarrow x$ we have that $f(x_k) \rightarrow f(x)$.

Therefore, each sequence of the form $(x_n, f(xn))\in G$ converges to $(x,f(x))\in G$.

So, the graph is a closed subset of $A\times A$.

Is this correct?? (Wondering)

No, it's incorrect, but you have some good ideas. To show that $G$ is a closed subset of $A\times A$, start by taking an arbitrary limit point $(x,y)\in A\times A$ and show that $(x,y)\in G$, i.e., $y = f(x)$. Being a limit point of $G$, $(x,y)$ is the limit of a sequence $(x_k, f(x_k))$ in $G$. Thus $x_k\to x$ and $f(x_k)\to y$. Use continuity of $f$ to deduce $f(x) = y$.
 
Euge said:
No, it's incorrect, but you have some good ideas. To show that $G$ is a closed subset of $A\times A$, start by taking an arbitrary limit point $(x,y)\in A\times A$ and show that $(x,y)\in G$, i.e., $y = f(x)$. Being a limit point of $G$, $(x,y)$ is the limit of a sequence $(x_k, f(x_k))$ in $G$. Thus $x_k\to x$ and $f(x_k)\to y$. Use continuity of $f$ to deduce $f(x) = y$.

I got stuck right now... (Worried)

When we take $(x,y)\in A\times A$ and we show that $(x,y)\in G$, do we not show in that way that $A\times A$ is a subset of $G$ ?? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
I got stuck right now... (Worried)

When we take $(x,y)\in A\times A$ and we show that $(x,y)\in G$, do we not show in that way that $A\times A$ is a subset of $G$ ?? (Wondering)

No, we didn't pick an arbitrary point in $A \times A$, but an arbitrary limit point of $G$, which lies in $A\times A$.
 
Euge said:
No, we didn't pick an arbitrary point in $A \times A$, but an arbitrary limit point of $G$, which lies in $A\times A$.

Ahaa.. OK!

Euge said:
Let $G$ be the graph of a continuous function $f : A \to \Bbb R$, where $A\subset \Bbb R$. Show that $G$ is a closed subset of $A \times A$. Since $G$ is closed, it is measurable. So you can use the Fubini theorem to show that $m^2(G) = 0$.

Could you explain me how I could use the Fubini theorem to show that $m^2(G)=0$ ?? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Could you explain me how I could use the Fubini theorem to show that $m^2(G)=0$ ?? (Wondering)

The $x$-section of $G$ is $G^x = \{y\, :\, y = f(x)\} = \{f(x)\}$. So $m^1(G^x) = 0$ for all $x$. Hence by Fubini's theorem, $m^2(G) = \int m^1(G^x)\, dx = \int 0\, dx = 0$.
 
Euge said:
The $x$-section of $G$ is $G^x = \{y\, :\, y = f(x)\} = \{f(x)\}$. So $m^1(G^x) = 0$ for all $x$. Hence by Fubini's theorem, $m^2(G) = \int m^1(G^x)\, dx = \int 0\, dx = 0$.

Since the Lebesgue integral is in the next chapter, is there an other way to show it, besides using Fubini's Theorem?? (Wondering)
 
  • #10
mathmari said:
Since the Lebesgue integral is in the next chapter, is there an other way to show it, besides using Fubini's Theorem?? (Wondering)

Before that, let me ask you this. What was the domain of $f$ supposed to be?
 
  • #11
Euge said:
Before that, let me ask you this. What was the domain of $f$ supposed to be?

I don't know... (Wondering) The exercise says nothing about the domain of $f$...
 
  • #12
mathmari said:
I don't know... (Wondering) The exercise says nothing about the domain of $f$...

Let's suppose the domain of $f$ is $\Bbb R$, so that $G = \{(x,y)\in \Bbb R^2\, |\, y = f(x)\}$. For each $n\in \Bbb N$, let $G_n = \{(x,y)\in G \, |\, |x| \le n\}$. Then $$G = \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty G_n$$. Using uniform continuity arguments, show that $m^2(G_n) = 0$ for all $n\in \Bbb N$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K