Proving theorem for polynomials

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the coefficients of two polynomial representations are equal. The approach involves showing that if the difference between the two polynomials is non-zero, it leads to a contradiction with Theorem 2, which states that a polynomial of degree n can have at most n roots. The user is confused about how the contradiction arises, particularly regarding the implications of the D coefficients being zero for all x, suggesting infinite roots. Clarification is sought on how this situation conflicts with the established theorem. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between polynomial roots and their coefficients in proving the theorem.
Tahoma
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove the following statement:

Let f be a polynomial, which can be written in the form
fix) = a(n)X^(n) + a(n-1)X^(n-1) + • • • + a0
and also in the form
fix) = b(n)X^(n) + b(n-1)X^(n-1) + • • • + b0

Prove that a(i)=b(i) for all i=0,1,2,...,n-1,n

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
0 = f(x) - f(x) = (a(n)-b(n))X^(n) + (a(n)-b(n))X^(n) + ... + a0 - b0
Need to prove that Di = (a(i)-b(i)) = 0 for i = 0,1,2,3,4,...n

But I do not know how.

This is the answer from book, using the method of contradiction:
Suppose that there exists some index i such that Di does not equal 0.
Let m be the largest of these indices, so that we can write
0 = D(m)X^(m) + ... + D0 for all x and D(m) does not equal 0. This contradicts Theorem 2. Therefore we conclude that Di = 0 for all i = 1, . . . , n, thus proving the theorem.

Theorem 2 is as stated:
Let f be a polynomial. Let a0,a1,...,a(n-1),a(n) be numbers such that a(n) does not equal 0, and such that we have: f(x) = a0 + a1X + ... + a(n)X^(N) for all x. Then f has at most n roots.

I don't understand the contradiction between theorem 2 and the statement regarding D(m). Could someone explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The polynomial with the D coefficients is zero for all x and therefore every real number is a root of it. Therefore it has more than m roots. But theorem 2 says it cannot have more than m roots.
 
Thank you, answers it perfectly
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K