Proving Trig Identity: csin(A-B/2)=(a-b)cos(C/2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Appleton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Trig
Appleton
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given a triangle ABC prove that

[itex]c sin \frac{A-B}{2} = (a-b)cos \frac{C}{2}[/itex]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



It looks rather similar to a formula mentioned in my book's lead-in to this exercise:

[itex]\frac{a-b}{a+b}=tan\frac{A-B}{2}tan\frac{C}{2}[/itex]

Which can be rearranged to

[itex](a+b)\frac{sin\frac{C}{2}}{cos\frac{A-B}{2}}sin\frac{A-B}{2}=(a-b)cos\frac{C}{2}[/itex]

So from this it would seem I need only prove that

[itex](a+b)\frac{sin\frac{C}{2}}{cos\frac{A-B}{2}}= c[/itex]

However this doesn't seem much of a simplification and I feel I'm still at square one trying to prove another identity. I also felt my approach was a bit unorthodox. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a,b,c are side lengths, A,B,C are the angles?

I didn't find a solution, but expressing C in terms of A and B and converting the cos to a sine makes the two sides more similar. There are also formulas for the sine of a sum/a difference.
 
Thanks for your reply, yes, a,b,c are side lengths and A,B,C are angles.
 
Appleton said:

Homework Statement


Given a triangle ABC prove that

[itex]c sin \frac{A-B}{2} = (a-b)cos \frac{C}{2}[/itex]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



It looks rather similar to a formula mentioned in my book's lead-in to this exercise:

[itex]\frac{a-b}{a+b}=tan\frac{A-B}{2}tan\frac{C}{2}[/itex]

Which can be rearranged to

[itex](a+b)\frac{sin\frac{C}{2}}{cos\frac{A-B}{2}}sin\frac{A-B}{2}=(a-b)cos\frac{C}{2}[/itex]

So from this it would seem I need only prove that

[itex](a+b)\frac{sin\frac{C}{2}}{cos\frac{A-B}{2}}= c[/itex]

However this doesn't seem much of a simplification and I feel I'm still at square one trying to prove another identity. I also felt my approach was a bit unorthodox. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

What do you mean by "csin"?
 
Sorry for any confusion, I ommitted a space. c is the opposite side length to the angle C and is being multiplied by sin ((A-B)/2).
 
Appleton said:
Sorry for any confusion, I ommitted a space. c is the opposite side length to the angle C and is being multiplied by sin ((A-B)/2).
To lessen ambiguity, you can use an asterisk to indicate multiplication -- c * sin((A - B)/2).
 
Please use the respective TeX syntax for trig functions. \sin instead sin, \tan instead of tan etc. trig functions are operators and not variables. It's bad style and uncomfortable to read.
 
nuuskur said:
Please use the respective TeX syntax for trig functions. \sin instead sin, \tan instead of tan etc. trig functions are operators and not variables. It's bad style and uncomfortable to read.
Phooey.
As far as I'm concerned, ##\sin(x)## is only marginally better than ##sin(x)##.

Also, trig functions are not operators - they are functions.
 
Sorry, I meant operators in TeX terms. I did write my work without proper syntax and got booed on by Eeryone. things like [itex]sin f(x) , \sin{f(x)}, \frac{d}{dx}f(x) , \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}x}f(x)[/itex]. Now I boo on it, myself :D Curiously, no one is complaining about the improper use of f(x), but it just hurts my eyes if everything is italic - difficult to keep track of where a function, operator is or a variable.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
nuuskur said:
Sorry, I meant operators in TeX terms. I did write my work without proper syntax and got booed on by Eeryone. things like [itex]sin f(x) , \sin{f(x)}, \frac{d}{dx}f(x) , \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}x}f(x)[/itex]. Now I boo on it, myself :D Curiously, no one is complaining about the improper use of f(x), but it just hurts my eyes if everything is italic - difficult to keep track of where a function, operator is or a variable.
It's not difficult if you use parentheses, as in sin(f(x)). People are going to comment if what you write is unclear.

This one really seems like overkill: \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}x}f(x). I use as little LaTeX as I can - pages with tons of LaTeX sometimes take much longer to render in a browser, so there's a cost to using it unnecessarily.
 
  • #11
OK I'll bear that in mind next time I post. I'm still no closer to solving it. I tried mfb's method but couldn't progress any further with it. I feel like I'm just trying random tautologies in the hope it leads somewhere, I'm reminded of monkeys and typewriters.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K