Proving with Delta Epsilon: A Beginner's Guide

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter conorsmom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Epsilon Proofs
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the delta-epsilon definition in proving limits, specifically in the context of the limit of a sum of functions. A user seeks clarity on proving that if limx→af(x) = L, then limx→a[x + f(x)] = a + L without relying on the established limit properties. The response emphasizes utilizing the epsilon-delta framework, suggesting the use of ε/2 to facilitate the proof. This method is essential for rigorously demonstrating limits in calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the delta-epsilon definition of limits
  • Familiarity with basic limit properties in calculus
  • Knowledge of function behavior as x approaches a specific value
  • Ability to manipulate inequalities and epsilon-delta arguments
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in detail
  • Practice proving limits using delta-epsilon arguments
  • Explore limit properties and their proofs, particularly for sums of functions
  • Learn about advanced limit techniques, such as the Squeeze Theorem
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of limit proofs using the delta-epsilon method.

conorsmom
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi there, I'm having trouble understanding how to prove things using the [tex]\delta[/tex] [tex]\epsilon[/tex] definition. I have read a few other threads and sites, but I can't seem to put it together. For example, I came across this problem, if given limx-->af(x) = L, how would I prove (using delta-epsilon and without assuming that the limit of a sum of two functions is the sum of their individual limits) that the limx-->a[x+f(x)]=a+L ?

Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(using delta-epsilon and without assuming that the limit of a sum of two functions is the sum of their individual limits)

You can always use the same proof sketch of limit arithmetics, only specifically applied to your case ;)
 
Hint: use ε/2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K