Proving X^(k*p-1)+1)mod p = x mod p

  • Thread starter Thread starter SpiffyEh
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the equation x^(k(p–1)+1) mod p = x mod p for all primes p and integers k ≥ 0, utilizing Fermat’s Little Theorem and mathematical induction. The proof begins by establishing the base case where x is 0 mod p and then assumes the statement holds for k, demonstrating that it also holds for k+1. The key steps involve applying Fermat's Little Theorem, which states that if gcd(x, p) = 1, then x^(p-1) = 1 mod p, simplifying the proof process. The alternative approach suggests that understanding the theorem can eliminate the need for induction in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Fermat’s Little Theorem
  • Mathematical induction
  • Modular arithmetic
  • Basic number theory concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the applications of Fermat’s Little Theorem in number theory.
  • Learn about mathematical induction techniques and their proofs.
  • Explore advanced topics in modular arithmetic.
  • Investigate alternative proofs for properties of prime numbers.
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying number theory, educators teaching modular arithmetic, and anyone interested in proofs involving Fermat’s Little Theorem.

SpiffyEh
Messages
191
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that x^(k(p–1)+1) mod p = x mod p for all primes p and integer k ≥ 0.
Hint: Use Fermat’s Little theorem and induction on k.


Homework Equations


I understand that fermat's little theorem is:
Let p be prime, and b e Z_p. Then b^p = b (mod p).



The Attempt at a Solution


Proof given in class:

If x is 0 mod p, then the statement is trivially true, so assume gcd(x,p) = 1

Let k = 1. We need to establish that x^(1(p–1)+1) = x mod p
Left side = x^p, and this = p mod p by FLT.

Now assume true for a given k, so that x^(k(p–1)+1) = x mod p
A variant of FLT tells you that x^(p–1) = 1 mod p when gcd(x,p) = 1, so apply that to
x^(k(p–1)+1) = x mod p

x^(k(p–1)+1) times x^(p-1) = x times 1 mod p
x^((k+1)(p–1)+1) = x mod p


I don't understand how this proves it at all. To me it just seems to get more complex at the end. Can anyone explain to me how this works?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone help with this? I really need to understand how it works
 
It sounds like you don't really understand induction. The basic idea is that you prove two things, for some statement S depending on a number:
  • S(1) is true
  • If S(k) is true, so is S(k+1).
And then this is taken - by induction - to prove that S(n) is true for all n, the truth "inheriting" through to all numbers.

The alternative statement of Fermat's Little Theorem in the middle of the proof there, that a^{p-1}\equiv1 \text{ mod }p, can be used to eliminate the need for induction. Then it's just a matter of knowing that 1k=1 for all k.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K