Undergrad Pseudorandom Entanglement and Special Relativity

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of quantum entanglement and its implications for special relativity, particularly regarding superluminal speeds. A hypothesis suggests that particles may not be genuinely entangled but instead exhibit pseudorandom behavior, creating the illusion of synchronization. However, this idea is challenged by established principles like Bell's Theorem, which asserts that local hidden variable theories cannot replicate quantum mechanics' predictions. Participants emphasize the compatibility of quantum mechanics with special relativity, asserting that standard quantum field theory resolves apparent contradictions without invoking superluminal signals. The dialogue ultimately reflects ongoing debates about the interpretations of quantum phenomena and their alignment with relativistic frameworks.
  • #61
greswd said:
Then what is your opinion on this paper http://dinamico2.unibg.it/recami/erasmo%20docs/SomeOld/RevisitingSLTsLNC1982.pdf
I think it has nothing to do with physics. It holds on to assumptions that are not critical for physics and relaxes assumption that is critical. That's my impression.
Bwt I already replied about this paper in post #26.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
zonde said:
I think it has nothing to do with physics. It holds on to assumptions that are not critical for physics and relaxes assumption that is critical. That's my impression.
Bwt I already replied about this paper in post #26.
I know, but you said something different in #26.

zonde said:
Giving up SR symmetries for FTL entities/phenomena is the only extension that is needed for LET i.e. physical laws for superluminal entities have to be different in different reference frames.

Since you think this paper I linked has nothing to do with physics, do you have any other LET extensions in mind?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K