Pull-off force: hose, pipe, clamp

AI Thread Summary
A recent study tested the pull-off force of a hose and pipe connection at a 10% reduction in clamp torque, revealing negligible changes in results. The discussion highlights concerns that higher torque might deform the soft plastic pipe, reducing friction between the hose and pipe. However, it is noted that minimal initial clamping is sufficient to initiate positive feedback, and excessive torque is unnecessary. The assembly differs from previous studies by focusing on clamp torque rather than position and involves a plastic pipe without grooves. Overall, the findings suggest that effective clamping is crucial to prevent fluid penetration without needing excessive torque.
jbenedet
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Was surprised by a study recently where we tested 6 samples for pull-off force at a 10% reduction in clamp Torque and noticed negligible shift in results. Is it possible that at higher torque the clamp is deforming the pipe, reducing the surface contact (friction) between the hose and pipe?

The pipe is a soft plastic, the hose is rubber, the clamp is steel. The pipe is inserted into the hose and a clamp is torqued down over the connection.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It’s similar but different. This is a study focused on the torque of the clamp. The other was for clamp position. This assembly also has no groove unlike the other example and is a plastic pipe, instead of a steel pipe. I am being careful not to provide proprietary information while still including enough info to work through the concept. Also, the community provided good ideas/brainstorming based on the info I provided previously. It was helpful. Thanks.
 
jbenedet said:
It’s similar but different. This is a study focused on the torque of the clamp. The other was for clamp position. This assembly also has no groove unlike the other example and is a plastic pipe, instead of a steel pipe. I am being careful not to provide proprietary information while still including enough info to work through the concept. Also, the community provided good ideas/brainstorming based on the info I provided previously. It was helpful. Thanks.
Do your managers know that you are having to resort to Internet forums to do your proprietary work? Are you working as an ME?
 
berkeman said:
Do your managers know that you are having to resort to Internet forums to do your proprietary work? Are you working as an ME?
This is so incredibly out of line it’s ridiculous. I’m not “resorting” to anything. I’m thinking about this because I enjoy it, not because I can’t get my work done.
 
It is often the case that you can more easily push a hose on, or off a pipe, but you cannot pull it off. When you pull on a hose, the tension causes the hose becomes slightly longer, while the diameter of the hose is reduced. The surface area of the hose effectively remains constant. That is the source of the positive feedback.

The hose must be clamped sufficiently to the pipe, that the internal fluid under pressure, does not penetrate between the pipe and the hose, under the band of the clamp.

jbenedet said:
Is it possible that at higher torque the clamp is deforming the pipe, reducing the surface contact (friction) between the hose and pipe?
No.
Very little initial clamping is necessary to start the positive feedback multiplication. Once the clamp is snug, additional clamping will be unnecessary.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top