Pulling a tablecloth from under a glass

  • Thread starter Thread starter Leo Liu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Glass
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
12 replies · 2K views
Leo Liu
Messages
353
Reaction score
156
Homework Statement
This is a statement.
Relevant Equations
##f=\mu_{k} N## ##F=ma##
1596128579431.png

The question is stated above.

I tried to solve it on my own and I obtained the following three questions:
$$\begin{cases}
a_{cloth}=\frac{F-\mu mg} M\\
\\
a_{glass}=\frac{\mu mg}m=\mu g
\end{cases}$$
Where small m is the mass of the glass and capital M is the mass of the cloth. However, the first equation does not appear in the solution given by my answer book. So I think I must have wrongly interpreted the question. I would like someone to explain the question to me. Many thanks.
P.S. The official answer is shown below:
1596129361786.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your second equation should be ##=\mu g##
The detailed acceleration of the cloth doesn't matter...only the time it takes. Presumably the "puller" can supply whatever force is required.
 
hutchphd said:
Your second equation should be
It was a typo. Sorry.
hutchphd said:
The detailed acceleration of the cloth doesn't matter...only the time it takes. Presumably the "puller" can supply whatever force is required.
You have got the point. Thanks.

Update: Yet if I cross out the second equation, the time it takes to yank the cloth out is independent of the force. Since there is nothing to be maximized, what's the point of asking for the "longest time"?
 
Leo Liu said:
Where small m is the mass of the glass and capital M is the mass of the cloth. However, the second equation does not appear in the solution given by my answer book.

Surely it is the second equation that does appear in the given solution?

As @hutchphd alluded to, the dynamics of the cloth are irrelevant. We essentially have a glass that accelerates uniformly at ##\mu g## and then decelerates, in a symmetrical manner, with a magnitude of ##\mu g##. The symmetry allows you to deduce the times for each stage are equal. The speed time graph is an isosceles triangle!

It is the longest time because the cloth can be pulled out arbitrarily quickly so that negligible impulse is initially imparted to the glass, causing it to come to rest well before the end of the table.
 
Can the answer T = 1/4 s be correct? If the cloth accelerates the glass for 1/4 s, where will the glass be located on the table at the instant the cloth is completely out from under the glass?
 
etotheipi said:
We essentially have a glass that accelerates uniformly at μg and then decelerates, in a symmetrical manner, with a magnitude of μg. The symmetry allows you to deduce the times for each stage are equal.
Not quite. I think the assumption is that without the cloth the friction is big so it decelerates "instantaneously"...makes the problem easier.too
 
TSny said:
Can the answer T = 1/4 s be correct? If the cloth accelerates the glass for 1/4 s, where will the glass be located on the table at the instant the cloth is completely out from under the glass?

Did they forget to add the distance traveled during the acceleration phase?

hutchphd said:
Not quite. I think the assumption is that without the cloth the friction is big so it decelerates "instantaneously"...makes the problem easier.too

I will bite the bullet... doesn't the question say the coefficient of friction without the cloth (i.e. glass on table) is 0.5?
 
etotheipi said:
It is the longest time because the cloth can be pulled out arbitrarily quickly so that negligible impulse is imparted to the glass, causing it to come to rest well before the end of the table.
Oh this makes sense. So we only pull the tablecloth during the first half of the journey. After the external force is removed, the friction changes its direction. Thanks James!
etotheipi said:
Surely it is the second equation that does appear in the given solution?
Meh. It's another typo :-p .
 
etotheipi said:
Did they forget to add the distance traveled during the acceleration phase?
They let ##s_0## represent the distance traveled during just the deceleration phase. But they took this distance to be 6".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
etotheipi said:
I will bite the bullet... doesn't the question say the coefficient of friction without the cloth (i.e. glass on table) is 0.5?
Oops. You are indeed correct. Doesn't that make the published answer incorrect by 2?)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
TSny said:
They let ##s_0## represent the distance traveled during just the deceleration phase. But they took this distance to be 6".
hutchphd said:
Oops. You are indeed correct. Doesn't that make the published answer incorrect by 2?)

Yeah, they should have ##s = \mu g T^2 = 6\text{in}##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Leo Liu and hutchphd
hutchphd said:
Oops. You are indeed correct. Doesn't that make the published answer incorrect by 2?)
Reading the official solution, it looks like they left out the distance covered while being accelerated by the cloth.
It makes the the answer too much by a factor √2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444 and hutchphd