Pythagorean Theorem: Simplifying with Ab/Ab + Bc/Bc = Ac/Ac

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rudeonline
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Pythagorean theorem and its application in a proposed notation involving the terms Ab, Bc, and Ac. Participants explore the validity of expressing the theorem in different forms and the implications of these expressions, particularly in relation to the speed of light.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the notation used, particularly the equivalence of Ab/Ab + Bc/Bc to Ac/Ac.
  • Others argue that Ab/Ab equals 1, while Ab2/Ab equals Ab, leading to confusion about the validity of the proposed expressions.
  • A participant attempts to prove that the speed of light should be zero by relating it to the Pythagorean theorem, suggesting that Ab and Bc must be equal for this to hold true.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the mathematical reasoning presented, indicating that the expressions do not hold under standard arithmetic rules.
  • There are claims that the Pythagorean theorem does not relate to the speed of light, with some participants emphasizing the need for a proper understanding of algebra before tackling more complex theories.
  • Participants discuss the implications of dividing by zero and the misuse of arithmetic operators in the context of the proposed equations.
  • Several comments reflect frustration over perceived misunderstandings of basic mathematical concepts and the implications of the proposed ideas.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the validity of the proposed notation or the relationship between the Pythagorean theorem and the speed of light. Multiple competing views remain, with significant disagreement on the mathematical reasoning and interpretations presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding basic arithmetic and algebra, as well as the potential misuse of mathematical symbols and concepts. The discussion also touches on the philosophical implications of time and space in relation to the proposed equations.

  • #31
You simply don't know (for starters) the difference between traversed distanced and velocity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
rudeonline said:
Correct 1+1=1...



c + c = [ c + c ]/ [ 1 + c^2 / c^2] = 2*c / 2 = c = 1

The maximium speed limit in the universe is c according to Einstein's relativity.

c can be set equal to one. It can be set equal to zero as an axis of symmetry?
 
Last edited:
  • #33
Are you stating that c in a^2 + b^2= c ^2 is light speed?
 
  • #34
The reason why..
Ab2 + Bc2 = Ac2 is that the 2 constants of Ab and Bc are melting together as one. If time increase, the same happens with distance. If something is always the same ( like a continue speed) Space and time are 0.
All is one. Can you proof god with math??
Ab/Ab + Bc/Bc = Ac/Ac is the same as Ab2 + Bc2 = Ac2.
 
  • #35
rudeonline said:
The reason why..
Ab2 + Bc2 = Ac2 is that the 2 constants of Ab and Bc are melting together as one. If time increase, the same happens with distance. If something is always the same ( like a continue speed) Space and time are 0.
All is one. Can you proof god with math??
Ab/Ab + Bc/Bc = Ac/Ac is the same as Ab2 + Bc2 = Ac2.

I took the liberty of highlighting your errors.

1 - Ab, Bc, and AC are not constants, they are just related.
2 - "Melting"? :smile:
3 - Distance, though related to time, doesn't necessarily increase with time (try "STANDING STILL" (aka no acceleration))
4 - So as long as I don't accelerate I'm not moving through space or time? That's only true in my own frame (according to me)
5 - Wow, that sentence made lots of sense. and I highly doubt you can prove god's existence with a^2 + b^2 = c^2.
6 - No it is not. Unles you mean 2*Ab + 2*Bc = 2*Ac, in which case it's not even pythagoras theorem anyways.
 
  • #36
This thread is making me cry : (
 
  • #37
You will cry, if you understand...calculaters are making you stupid. It workt well for you.
 
  • #38
rudeonline said:
You will cry, if you understand...calculaters are making you stupid. It workt well for you.
LOL! You do not understand even the most basic concepts of Physics or Math and claim that we are made stupid by calculators! Sorry, this thread is of no use.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K