[Q]Eigenfunction of inverse opreator and another question.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter good_phy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 3K views
good_phy
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi.

Do you know eigenfunction of inverse operator, for instance [itex]\hat{A^{-1}}[/itex] given that [itex]\hat{A}\varphi = a\varphi[/itex]

textbook said eigenfunction of inverse operator A is the same as [itex]\varphi[/itex]

which eigenvalue is [itex]\frac{1}{a}[/itex]

Can you prove that?

And is it really that [itex][A,A^{-1}] = 0[/itex] so both opreatator have a common
eigenfunction if eigenvalue is not degenerate, this theorem is called commutator theorem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just operate with A^-1 so you get [tex]A^{-1}A\phi =\phi =a A^{-1}\phi[/tex].
No need to commute A with its inverse.
Then proving the commutator=0 follows.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't understand why [itex]AA^{-1}\varphi = \varphi[/itex] It is absolute true that

[itex]AA^{-1} = 1[/itex] But applying [itex]AA^{-1}[/itex] to some function is

different matter. for example we assume A and its inverse can be matrix, function f is also matrix.

[itex]A(A^{-1}f)[/itex] is not [itex](AA^{-1})f[/itex] right?
 
Hm, yes, the law of association holds for matrices, so those two last expressions are equal.
 
good_phy said:
It is absolute true that

[itex]AA^{-1} = 1[/itex] But applying [itex]AA^{-1}[/itex] to some function is

different matter.
No, it can't be a different matter. To say that two operators X and Y are equal means that Xf=Yf for all functions f. This is no different from saying that two functions f and g are equal if f(x)=g(x) for all x.