1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

[Q]Eigenfunction of inverse opreator and another question.

  1. Nov 7, 2008 #1

    Do you know eigenfunction of inverse operator, for instance [itex] \hat{A^{-1}} [/itex] given that [itex] \hat{A}\varphi = a\varphi[/itex]

    textbook said eigenfunction of inverse operator A is the same as [itex] \varphi [/itex]

    which eigenvalue is [itex] \frac{1}{a} [/itex]

    Can you prove that?

    And is it really that [itex] [A,A^{-1}] = 0 [/itex] so both opreatator have a common
    eigenfunction if eigenvalue is not degenerate, this theorem is called commutator theorem?
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 7, 2008 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Just operate with A^-1 so you get [tex]A^{-1}A\phi =\phi =a A^{-1}\phi[/tex].
    No need to commute A with its inverse.
    Then proving the commutator=0 follows.
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2008
  4. Nov 7, 2008 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    The latex doesn't seem to work. The last term is \phi=a A^{-1} \phi.
  5. Nov 7, 2008 #4
    I don't understand why [itex] AA^{-1}\varphi = \varphi [/itex] It is absolute true that

    [itex] AA^{-1} = 1 [/itex] But applying [itex] AA^{-1} [/itex] to some function is

    different matter. for example we assume A and its inverse can be matrix, function f is also matrix.

    [itex] A(A^{-1}f) [/itex] is not [itex] (AA^{-1})f [/itex] right?
  6. Nov 8, 2008 #5
    Hm, yes, the law of association holds for matrices, so those two last expressions are equal.
  7. Nov 8, 2008 #6


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    No, it can't be a different matter. To say that two operators X and Y are equal means that Xf=Yf for all functions f. This is no different from saying that two functions f and g are equal if f(x)=g(x) for all x.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: [Q]Eigenfunction of inverse opreator and another question.
  1. Eigenfunction question (Replies: 4)

  2. Another Question (Replies: 11)