Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

[Q]Time deviation of expectation value

  1. Nov 14, 2008 #1
    Hi,

    You know famous equation, [itex] \frac{d<A>}{dt} = <\frac{i}{\hbar}[\hat{H},\hat{A}] + \frac{\partial\hat{H}}{\partial t} >[/itex]

    But liboff said if [itex] \frac{\partial \hat{A} }{\partial t} = 0 [/itex] then, [itex] \frac{d<\hat{A}>}{dt} = 0 [/itex]

    this is the proof

    [itex] \frac{d<A>}{dt} = \frac{i}{\hbar}<\varphi_{n}|[\hat{H},\hat{A}]\varphi_{n}> = \frac{i}{\hbar}<\varphi_{n}|(\hat{H}\hat{A}-\hat{A}\hat{H})\varphi_{n}> [/itex]
    [itex]=\frac{i}{\hbar}(<\hat{H}\varphi_{n}|\hat{A}\varphi_{n}> - <\varphi|\hat{A}\hat{H}\varphi_{n}>) [/itex]
    [itex] \frac{i}{\hbar}E_{n}(<\varphi_{n}|\hat{A}\varphi_{n}> - <\varphi_{n}|\hat{A}\varphi_{n}>) = 0 [/itex]

    If it is right, we can conclude time deviation of expectation value of certain operator is zero if and only if corresponding operator is not depending on time, no matter what value of [H,A]
    is!

    is it right? i can't accept this theorm.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 14, 2008 #2
    This theorem is only valid for eigenstates of H. d<A>/dt is generally nonzero for non-stationary states unless A commutes with H.
     
  4. Nov 14, 2008 #3
    The state vector is a function of time in the Schodinger picture, as opposed to the Heisenberg picture, appears to be what you are using. In general the state vector will then be evolving as a superposition of eigenstates.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: [Q]Time deviation of expectation value
  1. Expected value of Q(x,p) (Replies: 11)

Loading...