QC 6.4 Zwiebach: Deriving the Relativistic Dot Product

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
5 replies · 3K views
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Zwiebach QC 6.4

Why is

[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial{X^{\mu}}} \left( \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\tau}} \cdot \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\sigma}} \right) ^2 = \left( \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\tau}} \cdot \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\sigma}} \right) \cdot \frac{\partial{X^{\mu}}}{\partial{\tau}}[/tex]

The dot is the relativistic dot product.
What I am confused about is how you take the derivative with respect to one component X^mu of the spacetime vectors and get a quantity that still has [tex]\left( \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\tau}} \cdot \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\sigma}} \right)[/tex]. Is there an intermediate step someone could show me?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you explain just what kind of object everything is?

If I just lively think of X as a function of [itex]\tau[/itex] and [itex]\sigma[/itex] with values in a 4-dimensional vector space with the Minkowski inner product, then the partial derivative w.r.t. the i-th component is

[tex] \frac{\partial}{\partial X_i} \left(<br /> \frac{\partial X}{\partial \tau}<br /> \cdot<br /> \frac{\partial X}{\partial \sigma}<br /> \right)<br /> =<br /> \left( \mathbf{\hat{e}}_i \frac{\partial X_i}{\partial \tau} \right)<br /> \cdot<br /> \frac{\partial X}{\partial \sigma}<br /> +<br /> \frac{\partial X}{\partial \tau}<br /> \cdot<br /> \left( \mathbf{\hat{e}}_i \frac{\partial X_i}{\partial \sigma} \right)<br /> =<br /> 2\frac{\partial X_i}{\partial \tau} \frac{\partial X_i}{\partial \sigma}[/tex]

([itex]\mathbf{\hat{e}}_i[/itex] is a standard basis vector) Applying the chain rule would give

[tex] \frac{\partial}{\partial X_i} \left(<br /> \frac{\partial X}{\partial \tau}<br /> \cdot<br /> \frac{\partial X}{\partial \sigma}<br /> \right)^2 =<br /> 4<br /> \left(<br /> \frac{\partial X}{\partial \tau}<br /> \cdot<br /> \frac{\partial X}{\partial \sigma}<br /> \right)<br /> \frac{\partial X_i}{\partial \tau} \frac{\partial X_i}{\partial \sigma}[/tex]

Not quite what you have, but maybe you can see how your things are different from my things and fill in the gap.
 
Last edited:
Sorry. My post was rather terse.

[tex]X^{\mu}(\tau,\sigma)[/tex] is the mapping function from parameter space (of the parameters tau and sigma) into spacetime. So, in this context what is the basis vector (it is just some pseudo-Euclidean basis vector probably)? Is there a way to do this without going into basis vectors? Why does [tex] \frac{\partial}{\partial X_i} \left(<br /> \frac{\partial X}{\partial \tau}<br /> \right)<br /> =<br /> \left( \mathbf{\hat{e}}_i \frac{\partial X_i}{\partial \tau} \right)[/tex] ?
 
Last edited:
Because [itex]X = (X_0, X_1, X_2, X_3)[/itex]. If you differentiate it with respect to, say, component 2, you get
[tex] \begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \frac{\partial X}{\partial X_2}<br /> &= \frac{\partial}{\partial X_2} (X_0, X_1, X_2, X_3)<br /> \\&= \left(\frac{\partial X_0}{\partial X_2},<br /> \frac{\partial X_1}{\partial X_2},\frac{\partial X_2}{\partial X_2},<br /> \frac{\partial X_3}{\partial X_2}<br /> \right)<br /> \\&= (0, 0, 1, 0) = \mathbf{\hat{e}}_2<br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}[/tex]

Hrm, I know I did something wrong last night, but I'm still too sleepy to spot it at the moment...
 
Last edited:
ehrenfest said:
[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial{X^{\mu}}} \left( \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\tau}} \cdot \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\sigma}} \right) ^2 = \left( \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\tau}} \cdot \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\sigma}} \right) \cdot \frac{\partial{X^{\mu}}}{\partial{\tau}}[/tex]

You missed a dot (and/or a prime). The equation is:

[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial{\dot{X}^{\mu}}} \left( \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\tau}} \cdot \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\sigma}} \right) ^2 = \left( \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\tau}} \cdot \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\sigma}} \right) \cdot \frac{\partial{X^{\mu}}}{\partial{\tau}}[/tex]
where [itex]\dot{X}^{\mu} is defined in equation (6.40) on page 100.[/itex]
 
ehrenfest said:
[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial{X^{\mu}}} \left( \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\tau}} \cdot \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\sigma}} \right) ^2 = \left( \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\tau}} \cdot \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\sigma}} \right) \cdot \frac{\partial{X^{\mu}}}{\partial{\tau}}[/tex]
You missed a dot (and/or a prime). The equation is:

[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial{\dot{X}^{\mu}}} \left( \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\tau}} \cdot \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\sigma}} \right) ^2 = \left( \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\tau}} \cdot \frac{\partial X}{\partial{\sigma}} \right) \cdot \frac{\partial{X^{\mu}}}{\partial{\tau}}[/tex]
where [itex]\dot{X}^{\mu}[/itex] is defined in equation (6.40) on page 100.
 
Last edited: