QCD scale and massless limit of u & d quarks

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the QCD scale (~200 MeV) and the masses of up (u) and down (d) quarks, emphasizing the approximate global chiral symmetry in the context of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). Participants clarify that while the renormalization scale is unphysical, it is relevant in perturbation theory. The consensus is that for practical purposes, the u and d quark masses can be considered negligible compared to the QCD scale, allowing for effective hadronic models based on chiral symmetry. The pion decay constant, ##f_{\pi} \simeq 92 \; \mathrm{MeV}##, is highlighted as a critical parameter in this approximation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)
  • Familiarity with chiral symmetry in particle physics
  • Knowledge of pion decay constant, ##f_{\pi}##
  • Basic concepts of perturbation theory and renormalization scale
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of chiral symmetry in effective field theories
  • Study the role of the QCD scale in non-perturbative QCD effects
  • Examine the relationship between quark masses and pion decay constant in detail
  • Explore lattice QCD methods for better understanding of light quark behavior
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, theoretical physicists, and students studying Quantum Chromodynamics and chiral symmetry, particularly those interested in the behavior of light quarks and their interactions in hadronic physics.

GIM
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello!
Could anybody help me?
My wondering seems so trivial, but I can't skip it.
They say that since u and d quarks are much lighter than QCD scale(~200MeV), in reality we can consider the QCD Lagrangian has an approximate global chiral symmetry with respect to these two flavors. At first, it sounded plausible, but now I wonder what relation between the QCD scale and the quark masses there is and how. Is this problem related to the renormalization scale?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

The renormalisation scale is unphysical, but appears as an artefact when we do perturbation theory only to a finite order. So I don't think that's important.

The question is a tricky one, since the light quarks are never free and are in bound hadrons where strong (non-perturbative) qcd effects are ever present... Maybe a lattice person would give a clearer answer.

On the other hand, what is the qcd scale? The value at which the strong coupling becomes non-perturbative. It's not clear to me at which scale this is (below a gev for sure).

For practical purposes, it seems like ignoring the u,d quark masses is reasonable. Even the strange could be considered massless. You can see how good/bad an approximation this is by comparing pion and kaon massed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GIM
Having read the below thread. The quark review on the light quarks which vanhees posted is more informative!
 
Thank you, @RGevo.
I just copied the value of ~200MeV from the literature. In many literatures(I've seen), which treat the chiral symmetry, most of them mention the similar statements. Is this really tricky?
 
It's very tricky. A more pragmatic answer is that you can use chiral symmetry to build effective hadronic models. As it turns out, indeed chiral symmetry is a very good approximate symmetry of the strong interactions since the typical current-light-quark masses are small compared to the scale ##4 \pi f_{\pi} \simeq 1 \; \text{GeV}##, where ##f_{\pi} \simeq 92 \; \mathrm{MeV}## is the pion-decay constant that can be measured through the weak decay of the pions. Note that chiral symmetry is as good a symmetry of the strong interaction as is isospin symmetry (which is violated, because the ##u## and ##d## quark masses are not the same, and the difference is also a few MeV).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GIM
Thank you, @vanhees71.
What kind is the scale ##4\pi {f_\pi }##?
Now, you changed my question into the relation between quark masses and pion decay constant. Then, again, what reasoning makes me ignore the masses?
(For example, when I learned the pion decay, my professor used the formula ##\left\langle 0 \right|\bar u{\gamma ^5}d\left| {{\pi ^ - }} \right\rangle = \frac{{\sqrt 2 {f_\pi }m_\pi ^2}}{{\left( {{m_u} + {m_d}} \right)}}##. In this case, the massless limit gives "unacceptable result" and I think I have no hope to find the relation between the pion decay constant and the quark masses. I guess my example is beyond the main direction of my question and if so, then please ignore this. Thank you.)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K