Graduate QED vs Scalar QED: Proving Divergence in P&S 10.1

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that superficially divergent diagrams in Peskin and Schroeder's problem 10.1 do not violate gauge invariance for QED and scalar QED. Participants are tasked with proving this for 1-photon, 3-photon, and 4-photon vertex diagrams. It is emphasized that for proper vertices with an odd number of external photon lines, charge-conjugation invariance applies to both QED types. Additionally, the Ward-Takahashi identity is crucial for showing the finiteness of the four-photon vertex at any loop order. Proper combination of diagrams at each order is necessary for clarity in the proofs.
Higgsy
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
In Peskin and Schroeder problem 10.1 is about showing that superficially divergent diagrams that would destroy gauge invariance converge or vanish. We are supposed to prove it for the 1-photon, 3-photon, and 4-photon vertex diagrams. Does this change for scalar QED?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If this is a homework question, please post it in the homework forum.

Some hints: To show that proper verices with an odd number of external photon lines only, use the charge-conjugation invariance of QED, which holds for both spinor and scalar QED. For the four-photon vertex, use the corresponding Ward-Takahashi identity to show that it is finite at any loop order. Note that you have to combine all diagrams at a given order before you to the integrals to make this explicit for concrete examples of diagrams!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K