QFT and transitions between momentum states

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on quantum field theory (QFT) and the handling of interactions through perturbation theory, specifically using a classical mechanical model of three coupled oscillators with nonlinearities. The equations of motion are presented, demonstrating the transition from linear to nonlinear behavior as the coupling constant λ increases. The participant seeks to simplify the transition amplitude between momentum states using the Hamiltonian operator in the Schrödinger picture, while also exploring the implications of momentum conservation in particle interactions, particularly in 2->2 processes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) principles
  • Familiarity with perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonian mechanics and operators
  • Basic grasp of coupled oscillators and normal mode analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of transition amplitudes in QFT using the Schrödinger picture
  • Learn about the role of momentum conservation in particle interactions
  • Explore the phi-fourth interaction term in detail, focusing on creation and annihilation operators
  • Investigate the implications of nonlinearities in quantum systems and their effects on energy transfer
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers interested in quantum field theory and particle interactions.

hilbert2
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,611
Reaction score
611
Hi,

I'm trying to learn some QFT at the moment, and I'm trying to understand how interactions/nonlinearities are handled with perturbation theory. I started by constructing a classical mechanical analogue, where I have a set of three coupled oscillators with a small nonlinearity added. The eqns. of motion of that system are:

##m\frac{d^2 x_1(t)}{dt^2}=-kx_1(t)+k'(x_2(t)-x_1(t))-\lambda [x_1(t)]^3##
##m\frac{d^2 x_2(t)}{dt^2}=-kx_2(t)+k'(x_1(t)-x_2(t))+k'(x_3(t)-x_2(t))-\lambda [x_2(t)]^3##
##m\frac{d^2 x_3(t)}{dt^2}=-kx_3(t)+k'(x_2(t)-x_3(t))-\lambda [x_3(t)]^3##

Now, if ##\lambda = 0##, this system is easy to solve by finding out the linear combinations of ##x_1,x_2,x_3## that are the normal modes of this system and behave like independent oscillators.

In the perturbed case, where ##\lambda > 0##, I can still plot how the system oscillates in the normal modes of the unperturbed system, but now because of the nonlinear term, energy (kinetic+potential) is transferred between those normal modes (some transitions are symmetry-disallowed, though).

The QFT equivalent of this would be a one-dimensional Klein-Gordan field with the phi-fourth perturbation, which is obviously a system of infinite number of oscillators (normal modes of the KG field), unless I arbitrarily assign a cut-off at some value of momentum and discretize the k-space.

Now, suppose I have an initial state that describes a particle with definite value of momentum:

##\left|p\right>=a_p^\dagger\left|0\right>##

Now I'd like to calculate the temporary rate at which there happen transitions to states with some other values of momentum. From the Schrödinger equation, I have:

##\frac{\partial\left|\psi (t)\right>}{\partial t} = -iH\left|\psi (t)\right>## ,

where H is the hamiltonian operator. The initial transition amplitude from momentum state ##p_1## to momentum state ##p_2## is:

##-i< 0 | a_{p_2} H a_{p_1}^{\dagger} |0>## .

Now, the question I run into, is how do I simplify the term ##-i< 0 | a_{p_2} [\hat{\psi} (x)]^4 a_{p_1}^{\dagger} |0>##, where the psi-hat is the field operator? I should somehow be able to write that fourth power of ##\hat{\psi}(x)## in terms of the creation and annihilation operators. All textbooks I've read seem to do these things in the Heisenberg or interaction pictures, but I'd personally understand this easier if I saw it done in the Schrödinger picture.

EDIT: I understand that a particle of one momentum can't simply turn into a particle with some other momentum, because momentum must be conserved... It seems, however, that an excitation with some value of p could be converted to two excitations with different momenta.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If I write the phi-fourth interaction term with creation and annihilation operators, I get a sum like this:

##e^{i(p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3}+p_{4})x}a_{p_1} a_{p_2} a_{p_3} a_{p_4} +e^{i(p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3}-p_{4})x}a_{p_1} a_{p_2} a_{p_3} a_{p_3}^\dagger +e^{i(p_{1}+p_{2}-p_{3}+p_{4})x}a_{p_1} a_{p_2} a_{p_3}^\dagger a_{p_4}##

##+e^{i(p_{1}+p_{2}-p_{3}-p_{4})x}a_{p_1} a_{p_2} a_{p_3}^\dagger a_{p_3}^\dagger +e^{i(p_{1}-p_{2}+p_{3}+p_{4})x}a_{p_1} a_{p_2}^\dagger a_{p_3} a_{p_4} +e^{i(p_{1}-p_{2}+p_{3}-p_{4})x}a_{p_1} a_{p_2}^\dagger a_{p_3} a_{p_3}^\dagger##

##+e^{i(p_{1}-p_{2}-p_{3}+p_{4})x}a_{p_1} a_{p_2}^\dagger a_{p_3}^\dagger a_{p_4} +e^{i(p_{1}-p_{2}-p_{3}-p_{4})x}a_{p_1} a_{p_2}^\dagger a_{p_3}^\dagger a_{p_3}^\dagger+e^{i(-p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3}+p_{4})x}a_{p_1}^\dagger a_{p_2} a_{p_3} a_{p_4}##
##+e^{i(-p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3}-p_{4})x}a_{p_1}^\dagger a_{p_2} a_{p_3} a_{p_3}^\dagger +e^{i(-p_{1}+p_{2}-p_{3}+p_{4})x}a_{p_1}^\dagger a_{p_2} a_{p_3}^\dagger a_{p_4} ##

##+e^{i(-p_{1}+p_{2}-p_{3}-p_{4})x}a_{p_1}^\dagger a_{p_2} a_{p_3}^\dagger a_{p_3}^\dagger +e^{i(-p_{1}-p_{2}+p_{3}+p_{4})x}a_{p_1}^\dagger a_{p_2}^\dagger a_{p_3} a_{p_4} ##

##+e^{i(-p_{1}-p_{2}+p_{3}-p_{4})x}a_{p_1}^\dagger a_{p_2}^\dagger a_{p_3} a_{p_3}^\dagger +e^{i(-p_{1}-p_{2}-p_{3}+p_{4})x}a_{p_1}^\dagger a_{p_2}^\dagger a_{p_3}^\dagger a_{p_4} +e^{i(-p_{1}-p_{2}-p_{3}-p_{4})x}a_{p_1}^\dagger a_{p_2}^\dagger a_{p_3}^\dagger a_{p_3}^\dagger##

and it is multiplied with a factor that is proportional to ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{E_1 E_2 E_3 E_4}}## and integrated over all possible values of ##x## and the momenta ##p_1 , p_2 , p_3 , p_4##. The exponential factors in the sum above are probably meant to create a momentum-conserving delta function, if I've understood correctly(?)

If I'm trying to calculate probabilities for 2->2 processes where particles with momenta ##p_1 , p_2## collide and become particles with momenta ##p_3, p_4##, am I supposed to ignore all terms that don't contain an equal number of a and a-dagger operators?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K