Graduate QFT phi3 Feynman diagrams and correlation function

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating connected Feynman diagrams for a scalar theory with a \(\phi^3\) interaction, specifically for the process \(\phi(k_1) \phi(k_2) \rightarrow \phi(k_3) \phi(k_4)\) up to one-loop approximation. Participants express uncertainty about the inclusion of self-interaction diagrams and whether they contribute to the connected graphs. The correlation function at order \(g^2\) is discussed, with emphasis on the relationship between external leg propagators and the amputated Green's function. Clarifications are made regarding the definition of connected graphs, emphasizing that all external lines must be interconnected and that certain diagrams, such as those contributing to vacuum, should be excluded. The conversation highlights the complexities of identifying relevant diagrams and ensuring compliance with the rules of connectedness in Feynman diagram calculations.
ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
I have some difficulty understanding how to go about with this problem:
For a scalar theory whose interaction part is \frac{g}{3!} \phi^3, draw all connected graphs up to one-loop approximation contributing to the process \phi (k_1) \phi (k_2) \rightarrow \phi (k_3) \phi (k_4).
I came up with several graphs, you can see them in the attached picture (they are up to ~g^4 order). I am not sure about the self-interaction diagrams, but I think they are considered in the connected graphs (they are not away from the external legs).

To order g^2 show that the relevant correlation function is the product of the external leg propagators times the amputated Green's function. What are the graphs of the amputated correlation function ?
I am not sure whether here I'll have to also include the g^2 self-interacting graphs... without them I seem to be getting:
G \sim g^2 \Big( \frac{1}{s+m^2} + \frac{1}{t + m^2} + \frac{1}{u+m^2}\Big) \delta^4 ( k_1 + k_2 - k_3 - k_4)
which looks OK compared to also including them.
 

Attachments

  • kat.png
    kat.png
    34.5 KB · Views: 1,117
Physics news on Phys.org
By "self-interacting" you mean e.g. the first two in the second row? You are supposed to only consider connected graphs, so these two (and the very first one, and also some later ones) should not be there in the first place.

Also, I think there are more diagrams at 1-loop, e.g. more self energies and tadpoles...
 
Dr.AbeNikIanEdL said:
You are supposed to only consider connected graphs, so these two (and the very first one, and also some later ones) should not be there in the first place

I thought connected graphs were those that didn't have loops away from the internal/external legs (contributing to vacuum, which cancels out).

Dr.AbeNikIanEdL said:
Also, I think there are more diagrams at 1-loop, e.g. more self energies and tadpoles...
hmm, maybe
 
ChrisVer said:
I thought connected graphs were those that didn't have loops away from the internal/external legs (contributing to vacuum, which cancels out).

At least in the conventions I am aware of, "connected" means that all external lines are connected to each other. A better definition might be something like "momentum conservation is not fulfilled by a subset of external momenta". These are the ones that actually give a contribution to the T-Matrix.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K