QFT phi3 Feynman diagrams and correlation function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the process of calculating Feynman diagrams and correlation functions in a scalar field theory with a \(\phi^3\) interaction. Participants explore the connected graphs contributing to the scattering process \(\phi (k_1) \phi (k_2) \rightarrow \phi (k_3) \phi (k_4\) up to one-loop approximation, addressing the inclusion of self-interacting diagrams and the formulation of the relevant correlation function.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a challenge in identifying connected graphs and expresses uncertainty about including self-interaction diagrams in their calculations.
  • Another participant clarifies that only connected graphs should be considered, suggesting that certain diagrams presented by the first participant are not valid.
  • There is a discussion about the definition of connected graphs, with one participant proposing that connected means all external lines are linked, while another emphasizes that momentum conservation must be fulfilled by all external momenta.
  • Participants mention the potential existence of more diagrams at one-loop, including self-energies and tadpoles, indicating a need for further exploration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach consensus on the inclusion of self-interacting diagrams or the definition of connected graphs, leading to multiple competing views on these aspects of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of connected graphs and the treatment of self-interacting diagrams, which may affect the calculations and interpretations presented.

ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
I have some difficulty understanding how to go about with this problem:
For a scalar theory whose interaction part is \frac{g}{3!} \phi^3, draw all connected graphs up to one-loop approximation contributing to the process \phi (k_1) \phi (k_2) \rightarrow \phi (k_3) \phi (k_4).
I came up with several graphs, you can see them in the attached picture (they are up to ~g^4 order). I am not sure about the self-interaction diagrams, but I think they are considered in the connected graphs (they are not away from the external legs).

To order g^2 show that the relevant correlation function is the product of the external leg propagators times the amputated Green's function. What are the graphs of the amputated correlation function ?
I am not sure whether here I'll have to also include the g^2 self-interacting graphs... without them I seem to be getting:
G \sim g^2 \Big( \frac{1}{s+m^2} + \frac{1}{t + m^2} + \frac{1}{u+m^2}\Big) \delta^4 ( k_1 + k_2 - k_3 - k_4)
which looks OK compared to also including them.
 

Attachments

  • kat.png
    kat.png
    34.5 KB · Views: 1,141
Physics news on Phys.org
By "self-interacting" you mean e.g. the first two in the second row? You are supposed to only consider connected graphs, so these two (and the very first one, and also some later ones) should not be there in the first place.

Also, I think there are more diagrams at 1-loop, e.g. more self energies and tadpoles...
 
Dr.AbeNikIanEdL said:
You are supposed to only consider connected graphs, so these two (and the very first one, and also some later ones) should not be there in the first place

I thought connected graphs were those that didn't have loops away from the internal/external legs (contributing to vacuum, which cancels out).

Dr.AbeNikIanEdL said:
Also, I think there are more diagrams at 1-loop, e.g. more self energies and tadpoles...
hmm, maybe
 
ChrisVer said:
I thought connected graphs were those that didn't have loops away from the internal/external legs (contributing to vacuum, which cancels out).

At least in the conventions I am aware of, "connected" means that all external lines are connected to each other. A better definition might be something like "momentum conservation is not fulfilled by a subset of external momenta". These are the ones that actually give a contribution to the T-Matrix.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K