QM:Expectation values and calculating probabilities

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wavefunction
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probabilities
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 3K views
Wavefunction
Messages
99
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



An operator [itex]\mathbf{A}[/itex], corresponding to a physical quantity [itex]\alpha[/itex], has two normalized eigenfunctions [itex]\psi_1(x)\quad \text{and}\quad \psi_2(x)[/itex], with eigenvalues [itex]a_1 \quad\text{and}\quad a_2[/itex]. An operator [itex]\mathbf{B}[/itex], corresponding to another physical quantity [itex]\beta[/itex], has normalized eigenfunctions [itex]\phi_1(x)\quad \text{and}\quad \phi_2(x)[/itex], with eigenvalues [itex]b_1 \quad\text{and}\quad b_2[/itex]. [itex]\alpha[/itex] is measured and the value [itex]a_1[/itex] is obtained. If [itex]\beta[/itex] is then measured and then [itex]\alpha[/itex] again, show that the probability of obtaining [itex]a_1[/itex] a second time is [itex]\frac{97}{169}[/itex].

Homework Equations



The eigenfunctions are related via:

[itex]\psi_1 = \frac{(2 \phi_1+3 \phi_2)}{\sqrt{13}}[/itex]
[itex]\psi_2 = \frac{(3 \phi_1-2 \phi_2)}{\sqrt{13}}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay now I know I can represent [itex]|\psi\rangle[/itex] by:
[itex]|\psi\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{13}}\begin{pmatrix}2&3\\3&-2\end{pmatrix}|\phi\rangle[/itex]

I also know that initially:

[itex]\mathbf{A}|\psi\rangle = a_1|\psi\rangle = \frac{a_1}{\sqrt{13}}\begin{pmatrix}2&3\\3&-2\end{pmatrix}|\phi\rangle[/itex] which I can then bra through by [itex]\langle \psi|[/itex] in order to get [itex]a_1 \langle \psi |\psi \rangle[/itex]

Here's where I'm stuck, but I think maybe I should repeat the above process with the respective operators to get something like [itex]\langle\mathbf{A}_{\alpha}\rangle \langle\mathbf{B}_{\beta}\rangle \langle\mathbf{A}_{\alpha}\rangle[/itex]

However, I'm unsure because I'm not very familiar with QM and I'm trying to prepare for the class before it begins this fall. Thanks for your help everyone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a lot simpler than that -- I suspect you're over-thinking the problem.

I'm not sure how much I should give away in a first response, so I'll just offer an initial hint:

What is the probability that a state prepared in state ##\psi_i## will be detected as state ##\phi_j## ?
In other words, what is ##P(\phi_j|\psi_i)## (which is read as "probability of ##\phi_j##, given ##\psi_i##) ?

BTW, which textbook(s) are you working from? If you have Ballentine, then you might be able to deduce the answer to my question from his eq(2.28).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
strangerep said:
It's a lot simpler than that -- I suspect you're over-thinking the problem.

I'm not sure how much I should give away in a first response, so I'll just offer an initial hint:

What is the probability that a state prepared in state ##\psi_i## will be detected as state ##\phi_j## ?
In other words, what is ##P(\phi_j|\psi_i)## (which is read as "probability of ##\phi_j##, given ##\psi_i##) ?

BTW, which textbook(s) are you working from? If you have Ballentine, then you might be able to deduce the answer to my question from his eq(2.28).

Well the text I have is Modern Quantum Mechanics 2nd Edition by J.J. Sakurai; however, I'm just picking random problems from different sources to get a feel for QM. This particular problem is from here: http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/qmech/Quantum/node44.html

In regards to the problem:[itex]P(\phi_j|\psi_i) = |\langle \phi_j|\psi_i\rangle|^2[/itex] correct? So then the probability of measuring [itex]b_1[/itex] when the system is in the state [itex]\psi_1[/itex] is [itex]|\langle \phi_1|\psi_1\rangle|^2=\frac{4}{13}[/itex]
 
Wavefunction said:
In regards to the problem:[itex]P(\phi_j|\psi_i) = |\langle \phi_j|\psi_i\rangle|^2[/itex] correct? So then the probability of measuring [itex]b_1[/itex] when the system is in the state [itex]\psi_1[/itex] is [itex]|\langle \phi_1|\psi_1\rangle|^2=\frac{4}{13}[/itex]
Correct, so having measured ##b_1##, the system is now in the state ##\phi_1##. Then a third measurement is made, this time for A. What is the probability that, for your system in the state ##\phi_1##, that you measure ##a_1##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
CAF123 said:
Correct, so having measured ##b_1##, the system is now in the state ##\phi_1##. Then a third measurement is made, this time for A. What is the probability that, for your system in the state ##\phi_1##, that you measure ##a_1##?

Ah okay that would be [itex]|\langle \psi_1|\phi_1\rangle|^2 =\frac{4}{13}[/itex]
 
Wavefunction said:
Ah okay that would be [itex]|\langle \psi_1|\phi_1\rangle|^2 =\frac{4}{13}[/itex]
Correct, can you finish the problem?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
CAF123 said:
Correct, can you finish the problem?

I think so because I think now I need to multiply the two probabilities together to get [itex]\frac{16}{169}[/itex] Then I need to repeat the process for the state [itex]\phi_2[/itex]:

[itex]|\langle \phi_2|\psi_1\rangle|^2 = \frac{9}{13}[/itex]

Measuring [itex]\mathbf{A}[/itex] again:

[itex]|\langle \psi_1|\phi_2\rangle|^2 = \frac{9}{13}[/itex]

Multiplying together: [itex]\frac{81}{169}[/itex]

Now adding the two together yields [itex]\frac{16+81}{169} = \frac{97}{169}[/itex]
 
Yes, looks fine.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person