QM: Groundstates and changing Hamiltonians

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on ground states and the implications of changing Hamiltonians. The original poster presents a Hamiltonian for a system at time t<0 and describes the ground state. At time t=0, the Hamiltonian changes, and the poster seeks to determine the probability of finding the particle in the new ground state.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to normalize ground states and calculate probabilities using inner products. There is uncertainty about how to extract the wavefunction from the Hamiltonian and the distinction between ground states and wavefunctions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing their thoughts on normalization and probability calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of inner products to find probabilities, but there remains a lack of consensus on the relationship between ground states and wavefunctions.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the need for normalization and the distinction between the ground state and the wavefunction, indicating potential confusion about the concepts involved. The discussion reflects the complexity of transitioning between different Hamiltonians in quantum mechanics.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At time t<0 I have a Hamiltonian given by:

[tex] H = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> {\varepsilon _1 } & { - V} \\<br /> { - V} & {\varepsilon _2 } \\<br /> \end{array}} \right)[/tex]

with the ground state [tex]\left| {v_ - } \right\rangle = A\left( {\sqrt 2 - 1} \right)\left| 1 \right\rangle + \left| 2 \right\rangle[/tex], where A is some constant.

Now at t=0 the Hamiltonain changes, since [tex]\varepsilon_1=\varepsilon_2=0[/tex] for t>0.

I have to find the probability of finding the particle in the groundstate of the new Hamiltonian at the time t=0.


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, first I have found the groundstate [tex]\left| {m_0 } \right\rangle[/tex] of the new Hamiltonian. Since I have to find the probability of the particle being in the state [tex]\left| {m_0 } \right\rangle[/tex] at t=0, I still need the Hamiltonian for t<0, i.e. I need:


[tex] H = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> {\varepsilon _1 } & { - V} \\<br /> { - V} & {\varepsilon _2 } \\<br /> \end{array}} \right)[/tex]

I am a little uncertain of what should be done now. Can you push me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm also uncertain, but my guess is that you should first normalize your ground states and then take the square modulus of their inner product to get the probability:

[tex]P = |\langle v_- | m_0\rangle|^2[/tex]
 
I think we're on the right track, Irid.

I'm quite sure I have to use [tex]P = |\langle v_- | \Psi\rangle|^2[/tex], but how can I extract \Psi from the Hamiltonian at t=0?
 
You said that you have Psi, only named it m_0. Anyway, I think one needs to set up an eigenvalue equation and you'll obtain eigenvectors. The one which corresponds to the lowest energy is termed "the ground state".
 
I have already found (and normalized) the groundstate [tex]\left| {m_0 } \right\rangle[/tex]. But the groundstate is not the same as the wavefunction itself, i.e. the solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger-equation?

Please correct me if I am wrong.
 
Ok, I worked it out. The particle is in the groundstate, so [tex]\Psi(x,0) = \left| {v__- } \right\rangle[/tex] and the new stationary state is [tex]\psi(x) = \left| {m_0 } \right\rangle[/tex]. That is, we can find the probability as:

[tex] P = |\langle m_0 | v_-\rangle|^2.[/tex]

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K