QM: Interesting View - Get the Inside Scoop

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bhobba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interesting Qm
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around interpretations and presentations of Quantum Mechanics (QM), particularly focusing on a specific lecture that some participants found insightful while others criticized its content and delivery. The scope includes theoretical interpretations, philosophical implications, and the relationship between mathematics and physical reality.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express agreement with the lecture's content, finding it aligns with their views on QM.
  • Others criticize the lecture for rehashing wave-particle duality and misrepresenting the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, suggesting it lacks depth.
  • A participant mentions a willingness to consider "radical" resolutions to the Bell Inequality, indicating openness to alternative interpretations.
  • Concerns are raised about the use of language in the lecture, with one participant arguing that it reflects a lack of understanding of QM.
  • Some participants differentiate between the mathematics of QM and its interpretations, suggesting that the latter often leads to confusion and metaphysical speculation.
  • There is a discussion about the philosophical implications of QM, with some asserting that the true nature of QM is mathematical, while others question the relationship between mathematics and reality.
  • One participant references the need for a procedure to determine what qualifies as the "true nature" of QM, emphasizing the complexity of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation of QM and the effectiveness of the lecture in conveying its concepts. Some find value in the lecture, while others express significant skepticism and critique.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the lecture's approach to philosophical implications and the distinction between mathematical formalism and observable reality. There are unresolved questions about the nature of QM and its interpretations.

  • #271
martinbn said:
The distance to Andromeda is not a local quantity, but why would you call it nonlocal! The oposite of local is not always nonlocal, for example it could be global.
Really? I always thought that the meaning of nonlocal is "not local". If it would mean something else, then I fear I would have to agree with vanhees71 that it is a burned word that should be avoided. Because if it doesn't mean "not local", then everybody will just form his own opinions about what it should mean.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #272
gentzen said:
Really? I always thought that the meaning of nonlocal is "not local". If it would mean something else, then I fear I would have to agree with vanhees71 that it is a burned word that should be avoided. Because if it doesn't mean "non local", then everybody will just form his own opinions about what it should mean.
Well, i have seen "the local structure of manifolds..., while the global structure...". And i have never seen "the local structure of manifolds..., while the nonlocal structure...".
 
  • #273
martinbn said:
Well, i have seen "the local structure of manifolds..., while the global structure...". And i have never seen "the local structure of manifolds..., while the nonlocal structure...".
But this seems consistent with what I said. You don't talk about "the not local structure of manifolds" or "the part of the structure of manifolds which is not local". So "nonlocal" and "not local" seem to mean the same thing, while "global" means something different from "not local", even so it implies "not local".
 
  • #274
A. Neumaier said:
2-point functions are called correlation functions, but in general they do not directly describe measurable correlations. They are just nonlocal mathematical expressions. Only sometimes they can be interpreted in terms of measured correlations.

Independent of this, measured correlations at distinct points are still bilocal since you compute them you need to measure at two points, not only at one.
It depends about which two-point functions you are talking. Of course two-point Green's functions or proper vertex functions do not directly descibe observables. I was thinking, however, we are talking about correlation functions referring to measurable quantities like the two-point correlation function of the field intensities for two-photon measurements (see, e.g., Scully&Zubairy, Quantum Optics, Chpt. 21).
 
  • #275
martinbn said:
Well, i have seen "the local structure of manifolds..., while the global structure...". And i have never seen "the local structure of manifolds..., while the nonlocal structure...".
Global is a very special case of nonlocal, meaning depending on infinitely many points along a curve or a higher-dimensional submanifold.
 
  • #276
vanhees71 said:
It depends about which two-point functions you are talking. Of course two-point Green's functions or proper vertex functions do not directly descibe observables. I was thinking, however, we are talking about correlation functions referring to measurable quantities like the two-point correlation function of the field intensities for two-photon measurements (see, e.g., Scully&Zubairy, Quantum Optics, Chpt. 21).
The special case has the same properties as the general case, hence is as bilocal as general 2-point functions. Bilocal is not local, hence nonlocal. Pure time correlations are local.
 
  • #277
Then call it bilocal or multilocal, it's still referring to local events ("clicks of well localized detectors").
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
4K
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
6K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
10K
  • · Replies 90 ·
4
Replies
90
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K