QM: Interesting View - Get the Inside Scoop

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bhobba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interesting Qm
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (QM) as presented in a lecture by Phillip Ball at the Royal Institution. Participants express mixed reactions, with some finding the lecture's portrayal of wave-particle duality and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle overly simplistic and misleading. Key points include the distinction between quantum theory and its interpretations, with emphasis on the mathematical nature of QM and the philosophical implications of its interpretations. The discussion highlights the ongoing debate about the true nature of QM and its relation to observable reality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics principles, including wave-particle duality and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
  • Familiarity with the concept of entanglement and Bell Inequality.
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical modeling in physics.
  • Awareness of philosophical implications in scientific interpretations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical foundations of Quantum Mechanics, focusing on its formalism and applications.
  • Explore the implications of Bell's Theorem and its interpretations in quantum physics.
  • Study the philosophical debates surrounding the interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.
  • Examine lectures and writings by prominent physicists, such as Niels Bohr and Phillip Ball, on the nature of reality in QM.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, philosophers of science, and anyone interested in the foundational questions surrounding the nature of reality as described by Quantum Mechanics.

  • #271
martinbn said:
The distance to Andromeda is not a local quantity, but why would you call it nonlocal! The oposite of local is not always nonlocal, for example it could be global.
Really? I always thought that the meaning of nonlocal is "not local". If it would mean something else, then I fear I would have to agree with vanhees71 that it is a burned word that should be avoided. Because if it doesn't mean "not local", then everybody will just form his own opinions about what it should mean.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #272
gentzen said:
Really? I always thought that the meaning of nonlocal is "not local". If it would mean something else, then I fear I would have to agree with vanhees71 that it is a burned word that should be avoided. Because if it doesn't mean "non local", then everybody will just form his own opinions about what it should mean.
Well, i have seen "the local structure of manifolds..., while the global structure...". And i have never seen "the local structure of manifolds..., while the nonlocal structure...".
 
  • #273
martinbn said:
Well, i have seen "the local structure of manifolds..., while the global structure...". And i have never seen "the local structure of manifolds..., while the nonlocal structure...".
But this seems consistent with what I said. You don't talk about "the not local structure of manifolds" or "the part of the structure of manifolds which is not local". So "nonlocal" and "not local" seem to mean the same thing, while "global" means something different from "not local", even so it implies "not local".
 
  • #274
A. Neumaier said:
2-point functions are called correlation functions, but in general they do not directly describe measurable correlations. They are just nonlocal mathematical expressions. Only sometimes they can be interpreted in terms of measured correlations.

Independent of this, measured correlations at distinct points are still bilocal since you compute them you need to measure at two points, not only at one.
It depends about which two-point functions you are talking. Of course two-point Green's functions or proper vertex functions do not directly descibe observables. I was thinking, however, we are talking about correlation functions referring to measurable quantities like the two-point correlation function of the field intensities for two-photon measurements (see, e.g., Scully&Zubairy, Quantum Optics, Chpt. 21).
 
  • #275
martinbn said:
Well, i have seen "the local structure of manifolds..., while the global structure...". And i have never seen "the local structure of manifolds..., while the nonlocal structure...".
Global is a very special case of nonlocal, meaning depending on infinitely many points along a curve or a higher-dimensional submanifold.
 
  • #276
vanhees71 said:
It depends about which two-point functions you are talking. Of course two-point Green's functions or proper vertex functions do not directly descibe observables. I was thinking, however, we are talking about correlation functions referring to measurable quantities like the two-point correlation function of the field intensities for two-photon measurements (see, e.g., Scully&Zubairy, Quantum Optics, Chpt. 21).
The special case has the same properties as the general case, hence is as bilocal as general 2-point functions. Bilocal is not local, hence nonlocal. Pure time correlations are local.
 
  • #277
Then call it bilocal or multilocal, it's still referring to local events ("clicks of well localized detectors").
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
2K
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
6K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
10K
  • · Replies 90 ·
4
Replies
90
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K