QM Linear Algebra: Compute Matrix Exponential & Verify Unitarity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around computing the matrix exponential of a given matrix M and verifying its unitarity. The subject area involves concepts from quantum mechanics and linear algebra, particularly focusing on matrix exponentiation and properties of unitary matrices.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the meaning of the problem, with some questioning the nature of the given matrix and its properties. There are discussions about the Taylor expansion for the matrix exponential and the diagonalization of the matrix. Participants also consider the implications of the matrix being hermitian and the process of finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the diagonalization process and the relationship between eigenvalues and the matrix exponential. Some guidance has been offered regarding the evaluation of the Taylor series and the properties of unitary matrices, but no consensus has been reached on the specific steps to take next.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the correct diagonalized form of the matrix and how many terms of the Taylor expansion should be evaluated. Participants express a desire for a quick verification method, indicating a potential constraint in their approach.

cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I'm given the Taylor expansion of [itex]e^{i\Theta M}[/itex]
Then the question says "Compute the exponential for the given matrix M and verify that the resulting matrix is unitary.

The Attempt at a Solution



I really just don't know what they're asking...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the given matrix? And do you know what unitary means?
 
Given matrix [[3/4, 1/4][1/4, 3/4]] and yeah I know what unitary means.
 
Yes it is.

I just really don't know what they're asking me to do.
 
So if you have the expression for exponentiating a matrix, and the matrix to exponentiate, it seems to me like you can do it. What's the problem?
 
They give me the Taylor expansion for that exponential (I was just too lazy to latex it)... wouldn't it be stupid to evaluate a random amount of terms?

[tex]e^{i\theta M} = \Sigma\frac{\left(i\theta\right)^n}{n!}M^n[/tex] from n=0 to infinity
 
I suppose having the diagonalized version of the matrix would help for raising it to a power.

Is it correct that the diagonalized version would be [[2, 0][0, 1]]?
 
If you put M into the form UDU* where U is a unitary matrix, D is diagonal, and U* is the inverse (or transpose) of U, does that help?

And no, that diagonalised form is not quite right.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Mmm... how about D= [[1, 0][0, 1/2]] ?

Is there a maple command for doing this?
 
  • #11
I don't know about Maple. But it's pretty easy to do by hand -- it's not like a 2x2 matrix is that big...
 
  • #12
genneth said:
I don't know about Maple. But it's pretty easy to do by hand -- it's not like a 2x2 matrix is that big...

Yeah I know but I just wanted a quick way to verify it.
 
  • #13
cscott said:
Yeah I know but I just wanted a quick way to verify it.

In the diagonal form, the elements are the eigenvalues. To find the U matrix I mentioned above, you'll need the eigenvectors anyway. So just act M on the eigenvectors and you should end up with the respective eigenvalues. That should be check enough, and quick.
 
  • #14
I'm pretty sure the answer is D= [[1, 0][0, 1/2]] but if I don't know how high n should go how can I get a matrix out of the Taylor expansion they gave me?
 
  • #15
n is for all n: 0 to infinity. D^n for any diagonal matrix should be easy to evaluate. U*U = I for unitary matrices. And remember that matrix multiplication is distributive: AB+AC=A(B+C). Does that help?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K