QM Puzzle: Can One Particle Have Multiple States?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of quantum states in relation to particles, specifically focusing on whether a single particle can occupy multiple states simultaneously. It explores the implications of quantum superposition and the Pauli exclusion principle, particularly in the context of electrons in various states and their behavior in systems such as conductive materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that a particle is assigned a unique quantum state, referencing the Pauli exclusion principle which states that no two identical fermions can occupy the same quantum state.
  • Another participant introduces the principle of superposition, suggesting that a particle can exist in a superposition of states, which may imply multiple wavefunctions for a single particle.
  • A follow-up question is posed regarding whether two electrons can "share" states without violating the exclusion principle, raising the idea of partial occupation of states.
  • Some participants argue that while electrons cannot occupy the same quantum state, they can exist in orthogonal linear combinations of states, thus allowing for a form of shared state representation.
  • Discussion includes examples from spin-1/2 systems, illustrating how electrons can be described in terms of different eigenstates and their relationships.
  • There is a contention about the independence of states, with one participant questioning whether the states of electrons can be considered independent if they are in superpositions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of quantum states and the implications of the Pauli exclusion principle. While some agree on the principles of superposition and the exclusion principle, there is no consensus on whether electrons can share states or how to interpret their simultaneous existence in multiple states.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of quantum mechanics, particularly regarding the definitions and implications of quantum states, superposition, and the behavior of fermions. Unresolved assumptions about the nature of indistinguishability and the interpretation of quantum states remain present.

aaronsky12
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was taught that a particle is assigned to a unique quantum state. As a specific example, two bound electrons can't have the same quantum numbers in an atom. And likewise one and only bound electron is assigned to one quantum state in an atom. Yet, I am reading several solid state books and they are saying that an electron moving in a conductive material (crystal lattice) can be described by a localized wavepacket with a group velocity and central energy... That makes sense intuitively... but wavepackets are themeselves superpositions of sinusoidal traveling wave solutions to shrodinger's equation (each with a wavevector k)... This makes it sound like one particle is assigned several wavefunctions (each with their own quantum numbers)... How can this be true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Have not you heard that an arbitrary wave can be expressed by superposition of many plane waves(provided complete sets) and also Schrödinger eqn is linear so it should hold.
 


Thanks bhobba and andrien! OK, here is a related follow up question... First let me quote the wiki pages for the superposition principle and Pauli Exclusion principle state:

"[Quantum superposition] holds that a physical system—such as an electron—exists partly in all its particular, theoretically possible states (or, configuration of its properties) simultaneously; but, when measured, it gives a result corresponding to only one of the possible configurations (as described in interpretation of quantum mechanics)."

"The Pauli exclusion principle is the quantum mechanical principle that no two identical fermions (particles with half-integer spin) may occupy the same quantum state simultaneously."

My question is: Can two electrons "share" states and not violate the exclusion principle. It makes sense that one electron can exist in state A and another electron in B. But can one electron exist partially in state A and B, while the other also exists in partially state A and B at the same time?
 


aaronsky12 said:
Thanks bhobba and andrien! OK, here is a related follow up question... First let me quote the wiki pages for the superposition principle and Pauli Exclusion principle state:

"[Quantum superposition] holds that a physical system—such as an electron—exists partly in all its particular, theoretically possible states (or, configuration of its properties) simultaneously; but, when measured, it gives a result corresponding to only one of the possible configurations (as described in interpretation of quantum mechanics)."

"The Pauli exclusion principle is the quantum mechanical principle that no two identical fermions (particles with half-integer spin) may occupy the same quantum state simultaneously."

My question is: Can two electrons "share" states and not violate the exclusion principle. It makes sense that one electron can exist in state A and another electron in B. But can one electron exist partially in state A and B, while the other also exists in partially state A and B at the same time?

A state is the complete information for a particle.So how is it possible that an electron can be in two states simultaneously.
 


But can one electron exist partially in state A and B, while the other also exists in partially state A and B at the same time?
Yes. For example take a spin-1/2 system like an electron, and consider the eigenstates of Sz, call them |z,+> and |z,->, and compare these to the eigenstates of Sx, call them |x,+> and |x,->. The relationship is |z,+> = (1/√2)(|x,+> + |x,->) and |z,-> = (1/√2)(|x,+> - |x,->).

So if you have electron A in the state |z,+> and electron B in the state |z,->, you can say that they are both partially in states |x,+> and |x,->.
 


aaronsky12 said:
My question is: Can two electrons "share" states and not violate the exclusion principle.
Electrons are fermions and cannot occupy the same quantum state. This is taken care of by the PEP. Photons(bosons) on the other hand can, hence light is not solid.
 
Last edited:


Electrons are fermions and cannot occupy the same quantum state.
Quite right. Nonetheless, two fermions may occupy orthogonal linear combinations of the same states, as I have just described.
 


Bill_K said:
Quite right. Nonetheless, two fermions may occupy orthogonal linear combinations of the same states, as I have just described.
Even more: They have to occupy linear combinations. Electrons are indistinguishable - you cannot have "electron A in state a" and "electron B in state b", as "electron A" and "electron B" do not exist as different objects.
 
  • #10


Bill_K said:
Yes. For example take a spin-1/2 system like an electron, and consider the eigenstates of Sz, call them |z,+> and |z,->, and compare these to the eigenstates of Sx, call them |x,+> and |x,->. The relationship is |z,+> = (1/√2)(|x,+> + |x,->) and |z,-> = (1/√2)(|x,+> - |x,->).

So if you have electron A in the state |z,+> and electron B in the state |z,->, you can say that they are both partially in states |x,+> and |x,->.

But is not the state |z,+> and |z,-> represents two different state.so will it be safe to say that electron existing in one state is definitely independent of the other,as is the case here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
12K