QM Questions: Operators, Eigenfunctions, and Hydrogen-like Atoms Explained"

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter deep582
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on operators, eigenfunctions, and the energy levels of hydrogen-like atoms. Participants explore the implications of commuting operators, the degeneracy of energy levels, and the effects of quantum electrodynamics (QED) on these levels.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if two hermitian operators commute, there exists a common eigenbasis for the two operators.
  • It is noted that the position operator x commutes with the momentum operator pz.
  • Participants discuss the energy of hydrogen-like atoms, stating that it depends on the principal quantum number n but questioning why it does not depend on the angular momentum quantum number l.
  • One participant asserts that the energy levels for hydrogen are degenerate with respect to l, but this degeneracy does not hold in many-electron atoms.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of QED effects, mentioning that the 3p and 3s levels are not quite degenerate due to these effects, specifically referencing the Lamb shift.
  • It is highlighted that the degeneracy of levels with the same n and different l in hydrogen is related to a specific symmetry of the hydrogen atom, involving the conservation of the Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the degeneracy of energy levels in hydrogen-like atoms with respect to l, but there is disagreement regarding the influence of QED effects and the implications for energy differences between states such as 3p and 3s. The discussion remains unresolved on the extent of these effects.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of operators and the assumptions regarding the treatment of QED effects in hydrogen-like atoms versus many-electron atoms.

deep582
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I just had a couple quick questions while I'm reviewing for a test...

If two operators commute, what can we say about their eigenfunctions?

x commutes with pz, correct?

I understand that the energy for a hydrogen-like atom depends on n according to the equation ((-z^2 μe^4)/(2(4πϵ_o )^2 ℏ^2 ) 1/n^2 ), but why does it not depend on l also? Isn't a 3p electron supposed to have more energy than a 3s electron? Or is that only in many electron atoms?

Thanks, any help appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
deep582 said:
If two operators commute, what can we say about their eigenfunctions?
If two [hermitian] operators commute, then there exists a common eigenbasis for the two operators.
deep582 said:
x commutes with pz, correct?
Indeed.
deep582 said:
I understand that the energy for a hydrogen-like atom depends on n according to the equation ((-z^2 μe^4)/(2(4πϵ_o )^2 ℏ^2 ) 1/n^2 ), but why does it not depend on l also? Isn't a 3p electron supposed to have more energy than a 3s electron? Or is that only in many electron atoms?
You are correct. Since the Hydrogen atom has a purely Coulomb potential, the energy levels are indeed degenerate with respect to l. However, as you correctly note, this is not the case with many-electron atoms.
 
Actually, even in hydrogen the 3p and 3s (or 2p and 2s) levels are not quite degenerate because of QED effects: the Lamb shift of 2p vs 2s being the most famous example.

But leaving out QED effects the levels with the same n and different l are indeed degenerate in H: this has to do with a symmetry that the H atom has, but no other: the Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector is conserved for an exact 1/r potential.
 
Attention mna skt!

mna skt, I've moved your homework question to a new thread in one of the homework forums... click the following link to go to it:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=271329

Everybody else, please carry on. I'll try to remember to delete this post in a few days.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K