MHB Quadratic Equations: Cedric Cajigas' Qs Answered

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here are the questions:

Word problems involving quadratics?

1.) The owner of an apartment building with 50 units has found that if the rent for each unit is $3,600 per month, all of the units will be filled. But one unit will become vacant for each $100 increase in the rent. What monthly rent would maximize the monthly income? What is the maximum income?

2.) If a gun is fired upward with a velocity of 100 m/s, its height after t seconds is -5t^2+100t meters. At what time will the bullet be 250 m. high?

3.) In driving to Manila, a motorist discovered that he could make the trip in the expressway in 2 hrs. less time by increasing his speed by 9 km/h. What was his original speed?

Can you please solve these? :( And if you have time, kindly explain this for me. thanks

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Cedric Cajigas,

1.) Let's let $u$ be the units filled at a rent of $r$. We wish to express $u$ as a function of $r$. We are given:

$$u(3600)=50$$

We are also told that $$\frac{\Delta u}{\Delta r}=-\frac{1}{100}$$

And so, using the point slope formula, we find:

$$u-50=-\frac{1}{100}(r-3600)$$

Hence:

$$u(r)=-\frac{r}{100}+86=\frac{8600-r}{100}$$

Now, the revenue $R$ obtained is the product of the number of units filled and the monthly rent, thus we may state:

$$R(r)=r\cdot u(r)=\frac{r(8600-r)}{100}$$

To maximize the revenue, given that it is a parabolic function opening downward, we may find the axis of symmetry midway between the roots, at:

$$r=4300$$

And so:

$$R_{\max}=R(4300)=184900$$

Thus, we have found that when the rent per unit is \$4300 per month, the monthly revenue is maximized at \$184,900.

2.) We want to set $h(t)=250$ and then solve for $t$:

$$-5t^2+100t=250$$

Divide through by -5, then add 50 to both sides to get the quadratic in standard form:

$$t^2-20t+50=0$$

Apply the quadratic formula:

$$t=\frac{20\pm\sqrt{(-20)^2-4(1)(50)}}{2(1)}=\frac{20\pm\sqrt{200}}{2}=10\pm5\sqrt{2}=5\left(2\pm\sqrt{2} \right)$$

The smaller root is for when the bullet is on its way up, and the larger root is for when the bullet is on its way back down.

3.) Let's let $v$ be the original slower speed and $t$ be the time it takes at this speed. Since the distance is the same in both cases, then we may write (using $d=vt$):

$$d=vt=(v+9)(t-2)$$

Expanding the right side, we have:

$$vt=vt-2v+9t-18$$

Add $2v-vt$ to both sides:

$$2v=9t-18$$

Multiply through by $v\ne0$:

$$2v^2=9vt-18v$$

Since $$d=vt$$ we may now arrange this in standard form as:

$$2v^2+18v-9d=0$$

Applying the quadratic formula, we find:

$$v=\frac{-18\pm\sqrt{18^2-4(2)(-9d)}}{2(2)}=\frac{3\left(-3\pm\sqrt{2d+9} \right)}{2}$$

Since we should assume that $0<v$, we take only the positive root:

$$v=\frac{3\left(\sqrt{2d+9}-3 \right)}{2}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top